Talk:Bytham River

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warwickshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference to Brandon needs disambiguating

The reference to Brandon needs disambiguating, as there are several places with this name, and the link in this article currently points to a disambiguation page. Trouble is, there are two possible candidates:

Can anybody help? -- Chris j wood 17:10, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On further investigation, I don't believe there is a Brandon in Norfolk. So it must be the Suffolk one, which is only just over the border. -- Chris j wood 18:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Material from the old River Bytham article.

I've just merged in what I could from the River Bytham article. Some of the material appears to contradict what's in this article.

It flowed from near the current mouth of the River Severn east to reach the North Sea. Its mouth lay close to Pakefield in Suffolk.

Whereas this article states that it rose from vicinity of modern day Stratford-on-Avon and turned east again towards Lowestoft and emptying into the southern North Sea. Ae-a 14:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Megalith

I've created a new template for megalithic sites, Template:Megalith, as used on Pikestones and Round Loaf. Some instructions on the template talk page, to show how to use it. Cheers! --PopUpPirate 13:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bytham River existed?

As far as I know a very important part of British Quaternary researchers are of the opinion that the Bytham River is geophantasy: the existance is highly debatable: most probably two different river systems have been erroneously connected to each other. I don't see anything of the main opinion on this lemma.--Tom Meijer (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion of some evidence against the "traditional" course of the Bytham river here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618212030935. This could be added to the references. Orbitalforam (talk) 10:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]