Jump to content

Talk:iPod Mini

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening sentence(s)

[edit]

Sounds like it was written by a 4 year old, stupidly biased and waffles on about how the mini is superior to nano, as well as being incorrect, the mini runs on a hd, whereas the nano runs on flash memory. Nova prosp3kt 15:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its been fixed Nova prosp3kt 15:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

iPod 1st gen issues

[edit]

Maybe I'm stupid but I didn't see anywhere on the page about how the first generation iPod minis had problems with clicking noises due to poor design. Supposedly there was a very connection between the board and the casing and when you would squeeze the mini or simply after repeated use, the music would crackle and click. This would explain the extreme shortage in supply right after the minis came out.Will 21:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because both generations had this issue Truth protest (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glitches

[edit]

Should the bullets for the glitches be numbered? I don't see why... Trhaynes 21:44, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)

What is this 5gb Ipod mini? Didn't the original mini also have 4gb storage? Jarwulf 23:27, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

It only had 4Gb storage. -- ChrisO 23:55, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

About the Storage Item?

[edit]

Is the storage medium a Hard Disc that can handle almost unlimited data changes or a FlashRAM that will run out when I modify the contents of it 10,000 - 1,000,000 times?

It is a hard disk (and no hard disk I know of has the implied infinite life). The iPod Nanos use solid-state flash memory. StephenHildrey 19:43, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio

[edit]

the picture is almost definatly copyright violation. It's right from apple isn't it? I'm going to change it to the older mini pic I uploaded a while ago. it doesn't look as good but it's legit. revert if the newer pic is legit. Current image is NOW straight from apple but legit. 68.226.77.120 08:02, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Breakage

[edit]

Removing sentence: ‘The "broken" iPod mini will keep playing until it tries to load more music into its memory from the hard drive.’ — This isn't the only way it can break: it can break in various ways. If it's dropped, it can break. —Tokek 16:36, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Many owners of an iPod Mini who are very happy with it would say that Apple just threw a perfectly good iPod into a trash can like a peice of rotten food, also the Mini's discontinuement means that owners of an iPod Mini can no longer buy Acsesories for it, there is a possibility that because of this many owners of an iPod Mini who are angry at Apple for discontinuing it will not but any of the next generation iPods and refrain from buying anything from Apple in the future."

I'm a noob to Wikipedia editing and all, so I won't touch this. I'm pretty sure it should be deleted, though. Weasel words by the pound.

If you drop your mini into a bowl of electrified poo it will also break. Trust me JayKeaton 07:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Connectivity

[edit]

2nd gen mini supports firewire and USB2 - it only came with a USB2 cable however. Have updated article to reflect this

Laser etching?

[edit]

Some clarification on the purpose of the laser etching may be useful, probably just a few words are all that's required. Like, is it just so you can have your name permanently on the iPod, in case it gets stolen or something? --Super Jamie 09:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its simply so you can personalize your iPod. Some people put quotes or a lyric from a song. Many just put their names. Regardless of whats on there, it can be used to identify an iPod is it is stolen. AquaStreak 13:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Borat reference

[edit]

I added a youtube video to a scene from Borat, where he discusses the iPod mini, as a reference for the popular culture section. Is this sufficient as a reference?NightLord 20:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say so. I knew it was in the film, but just blindly saying it without some kind of references fails WP:V. Should be fine. Thanks! PaulC/T+ 22:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some minor edits:

[edit]

Changing "ultra-thin CompactFlash Microdrive hard drives" to "Microdrive hard drives (CompactFlash II)" since there is a distinct difference between Microdrive and Compact Flash. "Ultra-thin" is meaningless in this context given that Compact Flash is thinner than Microdrive/CompactFlash II.

16GB CF cards are now readily available so I edited this:

71.227.94.161 01:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)sham[reply]

and cleaned this section up slightly (repetition)

"The only difference" to "One difference" since the size, shape, colour etc are different.


Added external link - Troubleshooting iPod mini Problems http://www.apple.com/support/ipodmini/

Please give a good reason for removing any of these edits —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AppleMan1 (talkcontribs) 16:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

iPod mini running iPodLinux?

[edit]

I went onto iPodLinux website and it stated that it does not support iPod mini [1] Drahgo 11:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most iPods are not "supported". They still run iPodLinux fine; you just can't cry to the developers if something screws up. Honestly, my 4G's ("not supported") work with iPodLinux better than my 3G ("supported"). AquaStreak 13:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Microdrives for iPod Mini were not only made by Hitachi

[edit]

I have a second-generation 4 GB Mini, the CF drive inside is a Seagate. I am editing the article to reflect this. KyuzoGator 18:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a link to an article confirming that Seagate made some of the iPod Mini HDD's: http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/04/12/14/apple_begins_manufacturing_new_ipod_mini_player.html KyuzoGator 18:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ipod nano section removed

[edit]

I don't think that this should be in this article. I think that a link to the page is enough. </post> Geek45 (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree totally, also, who keeps changing the pic to the nano one?!?!!?!?89.7.143.199 (talk) 01:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation

[edit]

Per MOS:TM, we should present the product name as "iPod Mini", not "iPod mini". There is examption for the initial "i" because it is a distinctive mark of the product and there's an exemption for improper caps in the first two letters, but "Shuffle Mini" should be capitalised per standard title case. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

/me points to the title. BJTalk 11:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC) I see what you did there. BJTalk 11:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I performed the move per the consensus at Talk:iPod Touch, but didn't change any of the body, if that's what you're talking about. –xeno (talk) 11:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the body. Cool. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't change it because I'm lazy, not because I think it should stay that way. So ... be my guest =) It may deserve some short mention of the nonstandard capitalization in the lead if you do make the change. –xeno (talk) 12:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to change the title of this article to “iPod Mini” instead of “IPod Mini” since a lowercase i is the correct way to spell this product, but the move attempt failed because it said that I was trying to move the page to its current title... how do we fix this? Nicolás Macri (talk) 21:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion

[edit]

An archive of the discussion can be found at Talk:IPod Touch#Requested move. 217.36.107.9 (talk) 09:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IPod Touch which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 14:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IPod Mini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battery Capacity Source

[edit]

ngl....its kinda sus that the source for the stock battery being 450mah is someones store.................Vord1080 (talk) 11:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]