Talk:Friedrich Hölderlin

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Friedrich Hölderlin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

Untitled

Removed material that is copyright violation (typos and all) of http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/holderli.htm

RodC 02:00, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)

The grammar in the work section is pretty bad. It's a little hard to understand what is meant. Someone should set about cleaning it up jordan 15:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs rewrite

Added some on the "rediscovery" of Hölderlin in the 20th century, his influence and on modern editions. The article as it stood really gave no idea why Hölderlin is one of the most revered figures of German poetry, and one of its most intensely discussed classics.Strausszek (talk) 23:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Musical settings

There has been contention in recent edits about additions of musical settings, as to how to establish that a composition after a text by Hölderlin is notable and worth mentioning on this page. It has been proposed that notability is defined by the fact that the work in question has its own Wikipedia page (as opposed to only its composer). This would entail removing a fair amount of content. Is there a consensus on this topic that could result in a coherent set of content? Musiktheaterpedia (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]