User talk:FtWashGuy
Re your recent edit. This is NPOV. Fine. See, it's not difficult is it. Try checking your facts about Wikipedia policy before you accuse me of editing something I know nothing about. Using words like "finest" is almost always going to lead to reversion, since many will disagree with you. Because an organisation is more difficult to get into and has more equipment does not necessarily make it the "finest". Your comments on my talk page suggest you have a personal stake in the subject ("our department"), so you should watch that what you write is neutral. -- Necrothesp 12:56, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
You can definitely work on the article, please just don't remove the wikify tags etc. until you do. Alternatively you can create a temp page in your userspace to work on new articles before posting them. Good luck. Marcuse 02:17, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Hello again. By chance, I was looking again at that article you wrote about the Peter Betz trial and noticed you removed the name of the defendant since he was a minor. The problem is that anybody can still see the real name because it is saved in the edit history. You might want to contact an admin to have them delete the earlier edits from the edit history. Best, Marcuse 16:08, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Image:Laramie4.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]
Image:Laramie3.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]
Image copyright problem with Image:Udseal.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Udseal.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Murder of Peter Betz
[edit]
I have nominated Murder of Peter Betz, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Peter Betz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. AniMate 12:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
The article Upper Dublin Police Department has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Entirely non-notable small police department. Article is almost entirely about the police cars used, I assume because there is nothing else to write about.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)