Talk:International Air Transport Association

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Air Transport Association article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article IATA class codes was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 12 September 2012 with a consensus to merge the content into International Air Transport Association. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.

Untitled

Discussions regarding International Air Transport Association:

History

This section doesn't contain anything about IATA's split into a so-called "Tariff Co-ordination Committee" that set minimum fares for all members on a route-by-route basis on the one hand and the Trade Association on the other. It also dosen't mention IATA's controversial role during the pre-liberalisation era as the "extended arm" of predominatly government-owned national flag carriers that used the organisation as a tool to stifle meaningful competition between member airlines, especially those that were not backed financially by their respective governments - eg British United/British Caledonian, Canadian Pacific Airlines/Canadian Airlines International, UTA etc - and non-members - eg Caledonian Airways, Laker Airways etc, as well as the universal application of the unanimity rule - ie IATA's inability to take decisions on anything without unanimous approval by the entire membership. It looks to me as if the brief sentence in that section has somehow been copied from the IATA website - a bit like sourcing info about the harmful effects of smoking from a website representing the views of the tobacco industry. DeccanAviator 18:50, 20 August 2009 (GMT) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.194.221.231 (talk)

Dangerous Goods Transport

So far as I'm aware, the following sentence is about 20 years out of date:

They also regulate the shipping of dangerous goods and publish the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations manual, a globally accepted field source reference for airlines shipping hazardous materials.

I think this responisibility passed to ICAO in the early 1980s jmd 13:21, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The legally binding document for the transportation of dangerous goods by air is indeed the ICAO manual, however the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations remain the first choice of airlines and airports all over the world as they are easier to use than ICAO. If you should find yourself on the wrong side of the law then the CAA or FAA will quote from the ICAO Regulations in court, but the IATA Regulations are preferred for daily use.

membership

"IATA represents some 230 airlines comprising 93% of scheduled international air traffic...Currently, IATA is present in over 150 countries covered through 101 offices around the globe." It would be interesting to know who is or isn't a member, perhaps by country? This is too vague. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.9.203.145 (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Can anyone explain how and why Canadian airports got stuck with the Y prefix? Steelium 3:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Someone should vix the link for VS at the top of the article, right now it just goes to a dis ambig. page.

goals

IATA's goals are: is a commercial statement, better to remove the whole section.Mion 21:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IATA.png

Image:IATA.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date of use of three-letter codes?

Anyone know the date that the IATA started assigning the three-letter codes to airports? 216.203.62.5 (talk) 00:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: at least http://www.iata.org/about/pages/history_2.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"international fare prices have been set through bilateral governmental agreements rather than through market mechanisms..."

    THIS IS CALLED STATE MONOPOLY CAPITALISM YOU IDIOTS.  READ VLADIMIR LENIN'S IMPERIALISM THE LAST STAGE OF CAPITALISM  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.225.200.133 (talk) 18:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

84%?

"....small proportion of the world’s airlines. These 240 airlines, primarily major carriers, equate to approximately 84% of total Available Seat Kilometers air traffic"

84% is a large proportion not a small proportion. Who writes this crap? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:7:8500:982:20A5:DA3:8DBA:F837 (talk) 23:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citations verified

Hi,

All necessary citations to this article have been added. Is it possible to remove the box at the top of the article?

Thank you82.28.205.116 (talk) 13:30, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Facilitate

I will like to know five ways in which IATA facilitate international air travel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwiastic (talk • contribs) 17:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources to expand article

Can this page be considered a reliable source for this article? 69.165.196.103 (talk) 01:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Air Transport Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150327125029/http://www.iata.org/about/sp/Pages/partners.aspx to http://www.iata.org/about/sp/Pages/partners.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Search results for "IATA":

@Aviation AZ: Most academic papers about IATA focus on its price fixing activities. Per WP:DUE, this article does so as well. Therefore, per MOS:LEAD, it is appropriate to mention price fixing in the lead. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 17:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Billhpike sure. I didn't remove cartel. it is still in the lead per MOS:LEAD. Also, per MOS:LEAD: the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. It is located at the beginning of the article, before the table of contents and the first heading. It is not a news-style lead or "lede" paragraph. M.M.Kargan (talk) 09:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC) (

Blocked sockpuppet of Bodiadub, see investigation)[reply]

Thanks M.M.Kargan. In scholarly sources, IATA's activities as cartel are given overwhelming weight, so I feel such activities must be given prominent mention in the lead per MOS:LEADREL.

Over the last year or so, the lead section has been altered by several editors who have otherwise made minimal edits to the encyclopedia. I welcome scrutiny of my reverts, so I've posted at WT:Aviation#IATA article lead section — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 16:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to understand why the opinion of actions as a cartel is mentioned prominently since MOS:LEADREL mentions "Significant information should not appear in the lead, apart from basic facts, if it is not covered in the remainder of the article". Cartel is not a basic fact but an opinion by some sources but no major organization and this cartel business is not mentioned at all in the remainder of the article. redlegsfan21 (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of socks that have attempted to edit the lead

For future reference, here is a list of confirmed socks that have attempted to remove the consensus lead:

M.M.Kargan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Katalanimusk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Darkmatters1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Numerous other IPs or low edit accounts have also made similar edits. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 00:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

definite article before the association's acronym

Normal English usage is without a definite article. It thus resembles CNN and not the BBC. In parts of the article, however, the preceding definite article is used, and this is irregular. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.149.241.58 (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]