Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divine United Organization

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:56, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Divine United Organization

non notable 198.214.51.1 18:58, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain. There was a strong fashion for Indian spiritual organisations back in the 1960s. Even though this one is no longer notable now, you can't be sure that it wasn't notable in its day. (e.g. see Category:1911 Britannica for lots of people who get articles in Wikipedia because they were notable in 1911 even if they aren't notable any more.) OTOH I don't know enough about 1960s Indian gurus to know if this organisation ever was truly notable, so I'm not going to vote either way. — P Ingerson (talk) 19:12, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Related to other articles in WP. ≈ jossi ≈ 19:47, May 29, 2005 (UTC)

Note anon is placing numerous VfD's on articles related to new religious movements. Seems to be a POV warrior causing havoc. ≈ jossi ≈ 04:42, May 30, 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Interesting and historically significant. Affrodyetee 05:53, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
keep though I think that the current version is not in good shape. Andries 08:40, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.