User talk:Piotrus
You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today. |
Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "New Section" button above. |
---|
If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you. |
---|
Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance. |
---|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Lurking stats
[edit]Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
May 2024 video
[edit]FYI a 1 hour video, published in may 2024, during which Shira Klein talk about your/her case https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-BtV0sJVgM Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Visite fortuitement prolongée 24 likes. Fortunately, nobody cares anymore about this rambling conspiracy theory. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Land of Memories for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land of Memories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mga immoral 158.62.40.223 (talk) 19:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Mikolai Stroinski
[edit]Hello! I wish to ask you for help as a much more more experienced editor. I have created a new article in plwiki about a Polish composer Mikołaj Stroiński. A few months ago another user created an article about him in enwiki (Mikolaj Stroinski). It was initially a "Polish composer stub" only, so I have expanded the English article, filling in biographical details and adding sources - it's now about 4 times longer and I've more or less finished. However, on the talk page (Talk:Mikolai Stroinski) it is still rated stub-class.
I remember that while working on Dave Rudden you reassesed that article from "stub" to "start", using a tool called "Rater" ([1]). Could you check with it Stroiński's article in enwiki, and perhaps reassess it too, if appropriate? I feel it may deserve a start rating now, but I'm absolutely unable to check it myself for lack of experience and confidence. I'm sorry for bothering you with it. Best wishes! Laked98 (talk) 01:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Laked98 I've updated the WP:ASSESSMENT to start class. Anyone can do so, you are welcome do it yourself in the future. While the linked page has more guidelines, my rule of thumb is to promote any article I see from stub to start if it is beyond average stub length, defined at WP:STUB or around at 250 words (I use another gadget for word count, like rater). Anyway, I am happy to reasses articles, it is just few seconds, but I always encourage people to learn new tools too, so try using those gadgets (likely activated from your Preferences-Gadgets). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help. I've already installed the rater tool in my profile and I must learn to use it. Best wishes! Laked98 (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Laked98 TL;DR assessing stuff at stub or start can be done visually just on article's length. For C or B I use the criteria or 'longer' and 'citation density' - I expect B-class to have citations nearly everywhere. For WP:GAN and higher, there are dedicated processes. A few projects have B-class reviews but that's rare, pretty much I am familiar only with WP:MILHIST take on this. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help. I've already installed the rater tool in my profile and I must learn to use it. Best wishes! Laked98 (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail!
[edit]Message added 07:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
In case the email was thrown into the spam folder:) SCP-2000 07:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)