User talk:Saragc
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam_Spade (talk · contribs) 19:45, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 01:28, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Neutrality Project
[edit]Hi, I'm trying to ensure that the Neutrality Project has not become inactive. If you would still like to participate in it, please re-add your name to the Review Team list. Jame§ugrono 08:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Category:Ethical bank
[edit]Hi Saragc -- I proposed to rename Category:Ethical bank (which you created a while back) to Category:Ethical banking. Please come contribute to the discussion. Basically my reasoning is that "Category:Ethical bank" is not in proper wikipedia format, which needs to be either plural if it's about items (e.g., "ethical banks") or in gerund form if it's about a topic (e.g., "ethical banking"). The head article is ethical banking, so I think it should be that; also, a category named Category:Ethical banks -- however appealing to try to make those distinctions -- would never survive the categorization-review process. (More on that at categorization guidelines, but basically "ethical" is a value judgment that would be very hard to source.) Hope to see your helpful comments at the CFD. Cheers, Lquilter (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
File:Copia este libro.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Copia este libro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)