Talk:Via Rail
Appearance
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Privatization
[edit]Serious point of view and citation issues. Section shows NDP bias and is citing an explicitly political source (NDP website), no primary sources are cited here. This section needs to be updated with concrete plans from VIA/federal gov't rather than speculation (public-private partnership is distinct from full privatization). Raccoonny (talk) 05:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Itemized the whole redundant section. The issue is much better (that is NPOV and style fixes) in the paragraph immediately proceeding the section without the false assertion of privatization that is not in evidence. oknazevad (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Proper way of writing VIA Rail
[edit]VIA rail shall always be written with the V, the I and the A in capital letters. 2607:FA49:B840:AA00:88C8:452A:CCFB:93C7 (talk) 22:07, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- MOS:TM. Not on Wikipedia. oknazevad (talk) 00:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Why not? Millsy0303 (talk) 05:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- According to MOS:TM, "exceptions may apply, but Wikipedia relies on sources to determine when an unusual name format has become conventional for a particular trademark; only names that are consistently styled a particular way by a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are styled that way in Wikipedia." A quick look at journalistic sources (IE: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/via-rail-bill-people-over-freight-1.7066700) shows that it is normally spelled Via outside of Via Rail's trademarking. 138.51.82.49 (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Why not? Millsy0303 (talk) 05:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Too Many Subsection Headers Box
[edit]The only issue I can see is the 'background' section not entirely needing a heading. Otherwise I think it is fine. Millsy0303 (talk) 05:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- B-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class rail transport articles
- High-importance rail transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Mid-importance Canada-related articles
- C-Class Quebec articles
- Mid-importance Quebec articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- B-Class Montreal articles
- Mid-importance Montreal articles
- WikiProject Montreal articles