Talk:Double feature

This is a good start and most of the information is correct. But double bill and supporting feature are used interchangeably when they are actually two different forms of distribution and exhibition.

The main distinction was an A picture (top billed feature) was sold on a percentage basis and a B picture (supporting feature) was sold for a flat rate. The support feature was also given far less weight in advertising, especially in newspaper adds. In contrast, a double bill was a way for a distributor to combine two features, each given equal billing in advertising, in order to sell them on a percentage basis.

Any suggestions on how to address this with the current article? Jonathan Wild (talk) 09:12, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kings of the Bs, Dutton Paperback, Todd McCarthy and Charles Flynn editors, Economic Imperative, pg 16+17

Flying Through Hollywood . . ., Birch Lane Press, Sam Arkoff, pg 46-47

Untitled

This is a nice short article, B Touch, but it does tend to focus disproportionately on how the advent of the double feature lead to the end of two-reel short subjects. Perhaps some of this should be moved to short film. It would also be good to hear a little about the decline of double features as well. This article seems to be written from a US persepective; hopefully someone can give it a broader geographic scope.--Pharos 21:13, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It's a start, and it's better than nothing. I'm (frantically) working on the Our Gang article and writing articles for all fo my redlinks; most of my knowledge of double features comes from the references to it in Our Gang-related write-ups. Hopefully someone can work to expand the article; I'd like to learn about the extent of the double feature beyond America as well. --b. Touch 22:05, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Cleanups, add sections and copyedits.

Lots of changes. I think they're for the best... Killdevil 01:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]