Talk:Vervet monkey
Appearance
Vervet monkey has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vervet monkey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Images
[edit]Hello @Down time: None of these removals look correct to me.[1][2][3]. The first two are similar in concept to other images and so might not be needed however the only image of fruit eating, in the Diet section[4] is certainly needed. Invasive Spices (talk) 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Invasive Spices: Greetings. My interpretation of Wikipedia guidelines is that images should be used sparingly. Also, that photos are not decorative and should only be used to help illustrate something that might be difficult to comprehend based solely on text. That said, readers can imagine what a monkey looks like when eating a piece of fruit so I removed that image. If you feel showing a monkey eating fruit is necessary to further a reader’s understanding then please reinstate the image. In regard to my removal of the other images: Including two photos of a male’s genital coloration, and two photos of a female holding her young, is redundant and therefore not within guidelines. If you wish to reinstate those 2 photos I request the change be decided in community fashion after the opinions of several other editors have been gathered. In general, I feel there are still an excessive number of images in this article and more should be culled. In any event, I appreciate the conversation Down time (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- "Sparingly" is not my interpretation. From MOS:IMAGE
They are often an important illustrative aid to understanding.
I would like to have more images as long as it doesn't turn into another Commons:Category:Chlorocebus pygerythrus. On the first two images I see you meant they were redundant in concept and I agree we don't need them. Anyway none of those three are absolutely necessary so I won't revert anything. Pleased to talk with you about it - I learned some editors want fewer images. Invasive Spices (talk) 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- "Sparingly" is not my interpretation. From MOS:IMAGE
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of an educational assignment at Washington University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Fall term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 15:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- GA-Class British Overseas Territories articles
- Unknown-importance British Overseas Territories articles
- All WikiProject British Overseas Territories pages
- GA-Class Primate articles
- Mid-importance Primate articles
- WikiProject Primates articles
- GA-Class Africa articles
- Mid-importance Africa articles
- GA-Class Botswana articles
- Mid-importance Botswana articles
- WikiProject Botswana articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2012 Fall