Talk:Naiad (moon)

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Sources generally give dual pronunciations, [NAY-ad] and [NYE-ad]. Several (US) astronomical sources give only [NAY-ud]. This is consistent with pronouncing Aitne as [ET-nee] rather than [ITE-nee]. However, there was originally a dieresis over the i, which forces the diphthong, and therefore several mythological sources (such as Robert Fagles) give only [NYE-ad]. The Oxford English Dictionary gives [NYE-ad] as the pronunciation in both the UK and US, but [NAY-ad] for the US only.

orbit decay

Since its orbit is below Neptune's synchronous orbit radius it is slowly decaying due to tidal forces

Ok, but this doesn't look very significant since it relies on the pull from tidal bulges in Neptune's atmosphere induced by Naiad itself, which are small. Than again, does anyone have any quantitative data - like how fast is the decay, or maybe just how the decay rate scales with the satellite's mass and orbital radius? Deuar 14:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gone missing

Is it possible that it has crossed the Roche limit? Lanthanum-138 (talk) 06:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's now been rediscovered: see [1]. Also, it's not very likely IMHO that it would have done so and broken apart within just the 22 years between its discovery in 1989 and my comment here. Double sharp (talk) 11:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC) (Lanthanum-138 with a new username)[reply]

I do wonder however whether its distinctly elongated shape is not so much due to being a rubble pile that hasn't undergone any kind of settling into a quasi-spherical shape, but more that it's already on its way to destruction, and we're seeing it in the intial stages where it becomes ever more stretched-out but hasn't yet begun to actually disintegrate (see the diagrams on the Roche limit page). Then again, it may already be partly broken up, and only losing significant mass intermittently, maybe on the order of lumps fracturing off and floating away every few decades, maybe in sync with closer approaches as its orbit varies - how could we properly tell, without keeping a steady watch from fairly close up or dedicating a good bit of hubble/etc time to look for changes to the moon itself and any debris pulling away from it? 209.93.141.17 (talk) 00:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image correction

I will post this here and at Thlassa. I saw the image at NASA and contacted them, and they (Stphen Edberg) sent me an email reply with " IAU Name Discovery

III Naiad S/1989 N6 IV Thalassa S/1989 N5 V Despina S/1989 N3 "

They intend to fix it, and wen the do the image should be updated. TeigeRyan (talk) 02:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this is the photo they now use for Naiad and not for Thalassia. Check these two links: http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/naiad http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/thalassa 216.113.170.72 (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I updated articles. Ruslik_Zero 20:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naiad (moon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221181025/http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/sheppard/satellites/nepsatdata.html to http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/sheppard/satellites/nepsatdata.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]