User talk:Waxwing slain
It's interesting that Mother Cabrini is not incorrupt. Who's idea was it to make her appear incorrupt by faking her face and body and display it like the real incorruptibles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Incorruptibles (talk • contribs) 21:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:
For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam Spade 00:40, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for subediting. However, you might want to know that standard punctuation for multiple clauses or sub-clauses makes use of the structure you called "all fucked up". This standard is as follows: firstly, an introduction followed by a colon; then, a number of clauses seperated by semi-colons; and, finally, the last clause must begin with the word "and" or "or", followed by a comma, before the final clause. This standard is used when multiple verb-based noun clauses might cause confusion verbal constructions, or to outline long points with sentences. As you can see from the article, the connection of three clauses needs something a bit stronger than a comma seperation. But good work by being bold! Fifelfoo 05:30, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Image:Maudlin_of_the_well_part_the_first.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Maudlin_of_the_well_part_the_first.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 23:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Anathem
[edit]Good catch on the capitalization and spelling of Decenarian and the other order names in the Anathem article. Actually there was still one misspellt that I went and fixed. I had actually made the edits attributed to the two IP addresses before I created my account here, so I appreciate your improvement of my edits to the original article. Good work! Seth Leigh (talk) 08:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Edgar Allan Poe
[edit]Hey, do you have the source for the Terence Whalen information you added to Edgar Allan Poe? Because it's a featured article, you really should be careful not to add any info that doesn't have a footnote to support it. --Midnightdreary (talk) 23:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding that source. I'll look for one that is not from an article that was factually inaccurate; preferably, I'll find where Whalen originally published it. --Midnightdreary (talk) 02:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Waxwing slain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Waxwing slain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Waxwing slain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)