Talk:List of campaign settings

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 September 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Might it be alright to insert Polaqu in here? →mathx314^{(talk)(email)} 18:17, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I've started a cleanup

I'm about to go to sleep, but have gone through and cleaned up the red links from this page. Yes, this is a quick and dirty job; I hope the rpg.net and rpgnow.com links I put in place are fairly permanent and don't give us 404s a few years down the road.

I'm also removing homebrews since these are notorious to being started with great fanfare then going nowhere; the only homebrew that looks complete enough to consider keeping here is http://www.thekyngdoms.com/.

I'll finish up the fantasy section tomorrow.

I'm an inclusionist, not a deletionist, but for info to stay here it has to be something that can quickly get someone to more information about the complete campaign setting in question. Samboy (talk) 05:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've cleaned up redlinks in the Fantasy section and removed homebrews. My rule of thumb is that, for something to be listed here, it has to be a campaign setting that has been professionally sold. I will leave it to others to clean up the other sections. Samboy (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The superhero settings need a general cleanup as well: Green Ronin has released DC Adventures using M&M for the DC Universe. I also can't believe that Omlevex is listed here, but the Champions Universe isn't. Tomd1969 23:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomd1969 (talk • contribs)