User talk:Etxrge

I don't know any more details i'm afraid. I'm just stating the facts I know. (unsigned comment by User:NickHartley) 11:36, 30 October 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Wikipedia!

Welcome to the Wikipedia, Etxrge! And thanks for the contributions to the Dan Olmsted article. Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:

Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and Manual of Style.
When you have time, take a look at The five pillars of Wikipedia, and Assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
Always keep the notion of NPOV in mind, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your unique perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, Wikiquette, and you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~.

Best of luck, Etxrge, and have fun! Ombudsman 19:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Better late than never, huh? --Etxrge 10:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ant supercolonies

Do you have any reference for the information about ant supercolonies that you added to the Ant colony article? 6000 km seems an awful lot. Amaurea 18:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but no. It may seem peculiar that I don't know. But my involvement was only that I moved the paragraph from ant to ant colony 28 oct 2004. --Etxrge 08:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Justification article

Hi,

I noticed that you appeared in the edit history of the justification (theology) article. I recently made major changes to the article in an effort to move it to NPOV. If you have any suggestions for improvement (style, content, whatever), please leave a comment on the talk page for that article. The goal is to get the article to the point that the POV and cleanup templates can be removed.

Thanks, --jrcagle 20:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evolutionary history of plants

Please do not move major project articles without discussion first. This is rude and nonconstructive. --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answer in article discussion. --Etxrge (talk) 08:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

thanks for the image at House Martin. However, best not to specify a thumb size, since it will over-ride user preference. For example, my preference is set to 180px; if you prefer 220px, set your preference to that jimfbleak (talk) 09:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. That's valuable news to me. I didn't add the image, just spotted an incorrect caption and changed the width for consistency with the images above, when I was there anyway. Is "tumbx" typo or yet another feature that I am aware of. It seems to work.--Etxrge (talk) 11:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Skanked

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Skanked, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Skanked is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Skanked, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]