User talk:Dunks58

Welcome

hi duncan, welcome to wikipedia.

you might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping out: how to edit a page, How to write a great article, naming conventions, Manual of Style. you should read our policies at some point too. if you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. i hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

since you made some edits before you got an account, you can assign those to your username, which would be useful to establish your contributor record.

you can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

again, welcome! - clarkk 14:41, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Dunks, see my comments on Talk:Young Talent Time. I don't object to a rewrite of that section of the article, but a discussion of that aspect of the show is warranted seeing that it has stuck in the mind of so many Australians (and, with the benefit of recent history, it does look very odd). Of course we should note that, as you've pointed out on your own site, that Young is a twice-married man with children who has never been accused of any sexual impropriety by anyone. --Robert Merkel 03:52, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Spectrum

Your editing of spectrum prompts this tip: There is no need to write [[Australia|Australian]], since [[Australia]]n has the same effect (the whole word, not just the part between the brackets, appears in blue (or whatever color your browser is using) as a clickable link). Similarly with [[dog]]s and the like. Michael Hardy 20:49, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Triple J

Nice to see another person working on that article. Is there anything more you'd be able to add? It's probably one of the closest Australian articles to becoming a featured article, so any contributions there would be much appreciated.

By the way, a bunch of us Australians have got together to try and eliminate some of the huge holes in Wikipedia's Australian coverage. If you're interested, it's at Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board. Ambi 02:32, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

You wrote Breaker Morant too? Woah. I'll give that a bit of a copyedit when I get back, but that's pretty close to being featured-worthy already. The only problem I can see is that it does take the point of view that he was indeed a hero. For neutrality's sake, it'd be good to have some opposing views. It'd be nice to be able to get a public domain picture of him - which shouldn't be too hard considering he died in 1902. Ambi 03:55, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I've got no particular opinions about the guy, and haven't studied it much, but it's generally a good idea if an article reflects all views, rather than taking a particular slant. You may well be right, but the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy requires that little bit of neutrality. But like I said, it's a fantastic start, and really isn't far off being featured, I think, with a little bit more work. Ambi 04:32, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I noticed you made a (sp?) comment next to Andy Nehle. I am sure I saw an Andy Nehl in the crew credits on The Chaser Decides last night (Thursday). Not knowing much about him(them?), I don't know if it would be the same person. (slightly unrelated, Richard Fidler was a DAAS guy, and there is a Richard Fidler as head of comedy at the ABC.. now that HAS to be the same person!) -- Chuq 01:59, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Changing attribution for an edit

Hi Dunks, I noticed you made some anonymous updates under your IP address earlier... just thought you might like to know you can have these attributed to your user account... see Wikipedia:Changing attribution for an edit -- Chuq 07:00, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Breaker Morant

Might I just say: this is the finest piece of writing I have read yet on Wikipedia! If we can wikify it properly, have a few of my clarifications answered (see talk), find some appropriate photos and place it on peer review for a while to gather comments, then I reckon this could be a featured article!!! superb work, an interesting read and IMHO very well balanced. Please keep up the good work! - Ta bu shi da yu 13:44, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hey, we keep losing information from this article! see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Breaker_Morant&diff=6112912&oldid=6111202 - Ta bu shi da yu 03:00, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

The same thing just happened again - I fixed the mass erasing of content, but I accidentally wiped out a couple of your edits in the process, I'm sorry. Ambi 00:30, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

hi dunks58, careful with your editing, it looks like you wiped out a huge chunk of your article Breaker Morant again on 28th of Jan 2005 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breaker_Morant&diff=9753902&oldid=9752699). i realise that you refactored the court martial material to court martial of Breaker Morant (i moved the page), but it appears that you also inadvertantly (i presume) also deleted all the material after that section, including the reference section! i have since readded it back (and preserved the edits after that date too). does your browser have a bug or something? i suggest regularly using the "diff" tool after you make your edits to make sure you are changing what you really think you are changing! cheers clarkk 10:41, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

SMiLE

Hi Dunks, Thanks for your contributions to the Smile article. A few style pointers:

Song titles should be enclosed in "Double Quotation Marks"
Album titles should be Italicized, Not in Boldface

Thanks! And your handle sounds familiar. Do I recognize you from Chalkhills? --Lukobe 19:11, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Barry Humphries

I just wanted to say that I loved your work on the Barry Humphries article. - Ianbrown 14:12, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

James Branch Cabell

Significant portions of the text are copied from this page. The article is now listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Your help would be appreciated in rewriting the article. Thanks, Alphax ^τεχ 06:19, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aliens (1986 movie)

If you see this movie, ypu will discover some incongruousnesses. And I would like you explain me them:

The Colony people did not discover The Derelict in many years living on LV-426. And this moon were not as big.
Why did this people explore the terrain to discover The Derelict? They might find it by tracking the Alien transmission that were permanent and continous.
Why did The Derelict look like a ruin when in the first film were in one piece?
Why the LV-426 is called planet instead of moon?

By the other had, I have other doubt: Did Aliens movie create the concept of Weyland Yutani and Bishop?

200.92.231.119 12:11, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The Masters Apprentices

Excellent work on The Masters Apprentices article. My father loved the band, so I grew up listening to his recordings of it. I learnt a lot about the history of the band from the article, and the context in which the songs were written: I can just imagine Turn Up Your Radio being recorded during a boozy late-night session; I should have guessed that earlier. It's a classic though. Graham 10:58, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It reads very well with text-to-speech software. The most important things are to not use terms that are too obscure (so the words will always be pronounced correctly), and to not make typing mistakes, as these alter the stress of the words (especially in newer text-to-speech technology). You can find some samples of the synthesizer I use, eloquence, but I listen to the speech at very high speeds and at a higher pitch than the samples, to make working on the computer as efficient as possible. Graham 11:37, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dunks, I'd like to suggest you heavily reduce the Master's article and refer readers to Milesago for further info. I reckon the current article is too long and has too much trivia for an encyclopedia article. cheers Design 03:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Dunks, I haven't heard from you regarding my above comments on The Masters Apprentices, I would say the same for Dinah Lee. I guess maybe you have been cut & pasting many of your Milesago pages into Wikipedia. I still reckon you should cut them down for Wikipedia (too much non-encylopedic detail) and provide a link to Milesago. Hey, I love Milesago, but think for Wikipedia the articles should be more "readable". cheers --Design 02:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ABC

I think it is preferable to exclude allegations of political bias by governments in the history section; for that purpose, I'm creating a 'Relations between the ABC and the Australian government', where the issue will probably raise less concern among contributors who are keen to criticise what they see as 'left-wing bias' in the article. Tony 15:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wolof loan words

Hey Dunks,

I just saw your section on Wolof loan words. Nice stuff! I wanted to warn you, though, that I've moved them to Wolof language as perhaps a more appropriate heading. I was also wondering if would be possible for you provide some references--this list makes sense, but I've seen a lot of explanations of the history of the word "jazz," for example, so some refs would help us pin it all down. Thanks much! --Dvyost 13:50, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Calwell

I have reverted the "two Wongs don't make a white" story from the Calwell article, as I have done several times before. The "white" in the joke was not a reference to "white" people but to Tom White, a Liberal MP with whom Calwell was debating in the House. I also think it is incorrect to call Calwell a racist, despite his defence of White Australia a decade after other politicians had stopped doing so. Although he opposed Asian immigration he did not hold racist views about Asians. Adam 05:10, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Newtown

Hi, I just had a look at the Newtown article, I was amongst its first contributors. I must say, you know a lot about that suburb! What you've written eclipses my poor efforts! Arno 07:39, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Janis Joplin

I had to go back and see who was responsible for the terrible bit of misinformation in Janis Joplin. I assumed it was someone young and unfamiliar with the history of rock 'n' roll. 1958, huh? Nope. You're definitely old enough to know better. Shame on you! (No response expected -- but if you haven't already, go back and read the changes to your verbiage about Joplin being an innovator, 'cause you definitely need educating.) Your erroneous text is precisely the kind of thing black people talk about when we speak of cultural appropriation. Downright disgusting. deeceevoice 22:02, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Stewie Speer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing!

Monterey Pop Festival

Hi, I removed the text you added to the Monterey Festival article, since it was taken froom the Milesago site...but then I realized you probably wrote it on Milesago too. Did you? If so, I think it might still be a problem, since there is a copyright notice on the Milesago page, which doesn't match the GFDL that Wikipedia uses. Adam Bishop 16:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's your copyright on Milesago, but not here - if you add it here, it's no longer "yours", and other people can change it or even copy it to another site and make a profit off of it. If you don't care about that, I suppose it's fine. Adam Bishop 16:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brunel

Hiya, noticed you've done a bit on Isambard Kingdom Brunel, it's submitted for Peer Review now, [1] aiming to get it Featured! Comments appreciated, cheers. --PopUpPirate 00:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ellen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ellen.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 10:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Daddy-cool.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Daddy-cool.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. light darkness^(talk) 03:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regent Theatre move

Hi. The Regent Theatre article you recently created has recently appeared at Wikipedia:New articles (Australia). I hope you don't mind but I'm going to move it and create a disambiguation page. There are a number of other articles which link to it but which intend to link to the Regent Teatre in Toronto, Melbourne and London. From what I am able to gather, the London one was the original one. If you think that it shouldn't be moved please let me know. Thanks. -- Adz|talk 09:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Garry McDonald

I have made a couple of disambiguation edits to Garry McDonald, an article you made significant additions to some months ago. Would you very kindly check what I've done, please? (I live near a different Cranbrook School, in England) CarolGray 09:54, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Derek & The Dominos

I've been extensively working on the Derek and the Dominos page and have been able to get most of info I need to write it but I'm having difficulty with where the group got there name, from a source I have it says it was originally "Derek and the Dynamics" but from the wikipedia articles of Eric Clapton, Layla and Other Assorted Love Songs and what I had copied over from the Eric Clapton article into Derek and the Dominos it was "Eric and the Dynamos." I tracked down who first wrote in the information of "Eric and the Dynamos" and found out it to be you who put it on the Layla and Other Assorted Love Songs page here way back in April of 2005. I know that its been a very long time but do remember how and where you learned that info so I can know if your version is correct or not. Was it from a book you can look at again or something you had heard over the years? Your answer would help to an extreme extent because this question has been driving me crazy. Thanks, Patman2648 07:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Novelty and fad dances

Thank you for your recent solid contribution into the article. Please see Talk:Novelty and fad dances. `'mikkanarxi 02:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have no idea why I ended up at your user page - but you spelt margaret roadknights name wrong ( I once walked across an airport tarmac with her and had a conversation with her about none other than ellen mcillwain - small world) you should at least start an article about her (margaret that is) - wikipedia is infested with rude little 15 year olds - we need gems from you mate! cheers! btw I used to live in albermarle street in the very deep dark past (73) - rushed through last winter in a taxi with a lebanese taxi driver - its changed since the 70's for sure! SatuSuro

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Moddinah.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Moddinah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Herald-mural.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Herald-mural.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Mighty Boosh

I saw you have done a lot of work at The Mighty Boosh; I thought I'd see if you were interested in editing a wiki about the show at http://mightyboosh.wikia.com/ -- it was created about a month ago and mostly abandoned, and could use some loving attention. :) Thanks, — Catherine\^talk 20:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny O'Keefe

Thanks for the expansion of the JOK article. Nice work. —Moondyne 06:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jok2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jok2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Balmain Literature

Just letting you know that I've edited your contribution to Balmain. I've explained my edit on the talk page, but I thought I'd thank you for the contribution (in case you got the wrong idea about my edit), and suggest that you might want to look at expanding it so we can warrant a section for it. It would be a lot more helpful if you could provide references, too. (The only one's I could find the shows you discussed were pretty bad, and desparately need improvement). Cheers, Mark Chovain 07:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Whitaker (photographer)

Hello Duncan, I see that this article is largely based on your Milesago.com article. I also see that in a similar case, Stewie Speer, you gave permission to use the content and this was verified by the Wikimedia:Communication committee. Was that permission limited to the individual article or did it apply to all the articles from your website? --GentlemanGhost 01:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dunks. Thanks for the clarification. At first I had thought that someone was ripping you off by transcribing the Whitaker article here. But, I eventually figured out that you were putting your own work on Wikipedia, which put me more at ease. However, there seems to have been some miscommunication somewhere along the way. In my research, I contacted the admin, User:Shell Kinney, who put up the note saying that you had OK'd the use of the Stewie Speer info. As per ShellKinney, OTRS never got the confirmation email from milesago.com saying that it was OK to use the information that you had transcribed here. So, technically, I think we're still in a copyvio situation for both articles. You might want to send another email to OTRS. As as side note, I am sorry to hear about the (unrelated) plagiarism. If you sue the book's "author", I hope you get a lot of money. Anyway, thanks for all your hard work! --GentlemanGhost 01:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newtown

I am totally mystified why no one has challenged you (in good faith of course) the size and level of lack of citations on the article - plodding away there with millions of edits... Are you immune - or is there really a very good reason for an article that size ? (I used to live in Albermarle Street a very very very long time ago) cheers Satu Suro 04:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - the problem is we have had articles about single localities in various Australian cities of this size - and there are heaps more that are stub level - I suppose my style of editing is a lot more erratic to try to get project wide issues covered rather than single articles - its just my style perhaps - I'd be concerned about the mysterious darlington, eveliegh, forest lodge and so on.. or for that matter rose bay and darlinghurst - surry hills even. Yeah I was resident of various student dives in newtown and camperdown in the 73 to 74 era (have some photos - some B&w - must find) before fleeeing to vaucluse :) in 75... hmmm. If the cites keep coming - fine - otherwise I would be saying all the names of the sydney inner suburbs like what about... and so on. It looks good - not criticising that - just worried about what you might not get to in forest lodge or glebe and so on... Satu Suro 04:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Post-graf1.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Post-graf1.jpg. The copy called Image:Post-graf1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Seamural1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Seamural1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fred Krahe

Hi there, I noticed the stub you created for Fred Krahe. I have removed most of the text because it regards quite drastic levels of corruption from a former police officer. I would be more than happy for them to go back on the article if you could provide a source?

As it stands there is currently only one line on the article:

Frederick Claude Krahe or Fred Krahe (6 November 1919 - 6 December 1981, Sydney, NSW) was a NSW police officer and detective.

Ga rr ie 22:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tsouthern.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsouthern.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tsouthern.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsouthern.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Daddy-cool.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daddy-cool.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 00:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Daddy-cool.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Daddy-cool.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Daddy-cool.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Daddy-cool.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 21:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Daddy-cool.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Daddy-cool.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 21:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G'Day, Dunks

I've just had a fiddle with the Martin Luther King mural.

Do you think we ought to include some of the non-pictorial but often funny graffiti? Like that of the 1980s on the south-facing sandstone wall of Camperdown Cemetery that said "Is Frazer controlling your bowels?" to which someone had added "Shit yes!" And "May I stroke your thighs while you eat?" which one of the regular congregation at St Stephen's found so very disturbing that she had to approach the church by a different route in order to keep her mind on the liturgy. Just off King St, but I can't remember whether it was in Church St, or further towards the city, there was a sign in the '80s and early '90s that said "Ruby, I am leaving you for another woman." As it faded, someone altered it to read "Ruby, what about me little mate?" (in reference to Lionel Murphy). One of my favourites was in Erko in about 1996 where some poor bloke wrote something like, "Yes Sophie, I'm a stupid useless fuckwit but I love you."

Down in a lane off lower Station Street there's "Priority No. 1- Newtown Beach."

--Amandajm 09:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

out-along down-along Newtown and all

Unfortunately I'm no longer located in Newtown, or I would get my camera out.

I've also done some work on the Newtown article, trying to indicate what it was/is that made that suburb unique. I'm afraid that some of it would be difficult to reference. We need written memoirs that have been published.

Also, anything published by Megan Hicks, including her great photos would be an asset. [2] Megan systematically recorded pavement graffiti, including for example, the hands that walked right down King Street.

I've got a few really good Newtown photos, in particular St Stephen's and the Cemetery, and a great one of Newtown Festival which I will rescan, larger format for the Newtown site.

--Amandajm 04:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Komlosy

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Stephen Komlosy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 14:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sunshine Records (USA)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sunshine Records (USA), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Sunshine Records. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not "copy and paste" material from one title to another. This loses the article history and attribution, required for our licence! What to do if you think a page should be at another title? Use the move feature; see Wikipedia:How to move a page for details. -- Infrogmation 02:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jok-stamp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jok-stamp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Drug poems.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Drug poems.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Bates

You created the Daisy Bates article back in 2004, I had someone note there was a new book by Susanna De Vries Desert Queen: The many lives and loves of Daisy Bates and some similarities. The original article has been restructured but much of your work is still there. (see [3]) Paul foord (talk) 12:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bagpipes

I see you have a self-proclaimed loathing for bagpipes. Have you ever listened to Macedonian bagpipe music? It uses a similar instrument to the Scottish one, but there is a definite Middle Eastern lilt to the music which sets it quite apart from any bagpipe music you may have heard.

Just in case you're interested.

Bathrobe (talk) 10:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub tags at end, please

Hi, Please add stub tags at the end of articles, not before "See Also" as you did for Bandstand (Australia) - it makes life easier for people doing stub-sorting. See WP:STUB which says "By convention this is placed at the end of the article, after the External links section, any navigation templates, and the category tags, so that the stub category will appear last." Thanks, PamD (talk) 12:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newtown area graffiti and street art Ty 06:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dunks. I see your graffiti article is listed for deletion again. You need to add references to prove to other Wikipedians that it is notable. Books, magazines, newspapers, known sources. Stuff like this Sydney Morning Herald article. I'm sure if you perform refined Google searches you'll find more. Cheers, --Lester 12:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harvey James

Hi Dunks58. Good to see you created the article, Harvey James. Is there a reference you got the information from? Let me know if you need any assistance formatting references. Regards, --Lester 21:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Festival 60s.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Festival 60s.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sunny von Bülow

I was just curious as to whether you were going to write articles on George Crawford and Columbia Gas & Electric Company? If none are currently planned, I'm wondering why we need them redlinked in the article. Neither seems high-profile enough to expect an article in the near future. Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maladjusted.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maladjusted.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 10:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've withdrawn the nom. I noticed that another editor had uploaded a copyrighted image over the top of yours. I've reverted to your version. --JD554 (talk) 11:09, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Voyager

Why have you made a new article at Crystal Voyager (film) rather than just expanding the previous article at Crystal Voyager? There's nothing else at the title, so the film should be at the plain title with no disambiguation. I was about to do a formal Request move, but wondered whether you had some reason for the choice of article title? PamD (talk) 15:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aberfan

Hi Dunks58, thank you for expanding Aberfan! I noticed your edit shares similarities to http://www.milesago.com/almanac/1966.htm. Wikipedia can't accept large amounts of non-free text, is that website public domain and ok to use? I am a little worried about copyright violation. Regards, --Commander Keane (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know you can use the "Show preview" button on the edit page to avoid multiple saves when editing an article? I mean this sincerely.--Commander Keane (talk) 09:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sven Libaek

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sven Libaek, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Vague assertions of notability but not substantiated by independent sources. We should not have articles on (presumably) living individuals without robust sources, see WP:BLP.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Guy (Help!) 21:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please add edit summaries

Hi,

You're clearly a long-time editor, so I won't template you with {{subst:uw-editsummary}}, but please type in something in edit summaries.

Mark Hurd (talk) 05:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Warning

My mistake, I was referring to Talk:Music video, which you had made edits to. Another user after you blanked the page, and I meant to give that warning to them.

Speedy deletion of Tully (band)

A tag has been placed on Tully (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cycle~ (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tully

When donating copyrighted materials, the source must be unquestionably licensed for use. This is often as simple as a quick notice on the site (see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online). I don't want to stifle your information – it looks very useful – but we must be absolutely sure that we can use information as per our copyright policy. Cheers! Cycle~ (talk) 01:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Clementine-fonda.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Clementine-fonda.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

I've name-dropped you at this discussion. I remember our discussion a long, long time ago about the Masters Apprentices which is why I mentioned that article specifically. Graham87 03:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message on the talk page. I hate to be a pain about the copyright permissions thing, but can you note the license of your work on the Milesago website? Wikipedia uses the CC-by-SA 3.0 license along with the GFDL. To be compatible with Wikipedia, your text needs to use the former license, which means that it can be used commercially and it must be redistributed under the same license. Here are some guidelines for noting that a website is licensed under the CC-by-SA. The copyright issue will probably come up repeatedly, and not everyone will remember that you're the owner of Milesago so text from there is OK in Wikipedia. If you have any further questions about licensing and permissions, I recommend that you get in touch with Pfctdayelise, a fellow Aussie Wikipedian. I'm confident about my message here, but I'm not familiar with the finer points of Wikipedia's licensing. Graham87 09:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everybody’s (Australian magazine)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Everybody’s (Australian magazine), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.milesago.com/press/everybodys.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Everybody’s (Australian magazine)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Everybody’s (Australian magazine), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.milesago.com/press/everybodys.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Everybody’s (Australian magazine) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Everybody’s (Australian magazine) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Everybody’s (Australian magazine). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Everybody’s (Australian magazine) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! MLauba (talk) 10:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dunks58. You have new messages at MLauba's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MLauba (talk) 13:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Brunel-shield.JPG

File:Brunel-shield.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Brunel-shield.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Brunel-shield.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enmore-Jungle.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Enmore-Jungle.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sunshine pop

You added significant text to Sunshine pop but for the most part it was uncited. I removed the uncited text. Although you have made many edits to Wikipedia, I'd like to remind you of the Wikipedia citation and no original resaerch policies. Also, you incorrectly marked the edit as "minor", so I would also like to remind you of the minor edit policy. I am hoping you can find some citations from reliable sources and restore the gist of the text. Thanks, hulmem (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I knew how to insert sound files, this is where I would put that groaning noise that Kif makes whenever Zapp Brannigan makes an annoying remark. I would have thought that the courteous thing to do would have been to insert a "citation needed" tag and alert me to the fact rather than simply deleting the text? Never mind - I will find the appropriate reference and restore the text as soon as I get a chance. I appreciate your interest and feedback. - Dunks (talk) 23:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CMF. If I had the audio file, I would have put it here :) First let me say please don't take my actions and remarks to mean that your contributions are not well done or not appreciated. If you had only added one fact, I would have put the "citation needed" tag; but you added enough text that about five facts would have needed citations. When you add text, it is really your responsibility to cite at the time you add the text; not just when someone notes the lack of citations or removes the text due to lack of citations. If I had a dollar for every occurence of "citation needed" over a year old, I'd have a lot of dollars. The text you added/modified was well written but came across as original research. If I interpret your reference to Kif's reaction correctly, you may think you are on expert on the topic (which you may very well be) and you get frustrated when idiots like me question your additions. However, citing reliable sources is a key element of one of the five pillars of Wikipedia. Perhaps you have made many edits in the past without citing sources. I reverted this particular edit (out of the millions of edits adding uncited facts in Wikipedia) simply because Sunshine pop is one of the pages I watch and you added a significant set of (uncited) factual statements. Nothing personal. I sincerely hope you are able to find reliable sources to cite and I will try to take the time the look for some myself, as Sunshine pop is one of my favorite music genres. Thanks again, hulmem (talk) 04:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem -- I just hadn't had a chance to get back to it to add the citations -- it was very late at night when I did it and I was bouncing back and forth from this and several other articles while I was editing the Warner Bros Records piece that I'm working on; it got late, I had to go to bed and I forgot to go back and add citations, sorry. I *would* appreciate getting some feedback on the Warner Bros article if you have a chance (it's getting a bit long I'm afraid), just please be aware that I'm still editing it, and for personal reasons I don't have long periods to spend on it -- I have to work in fits and start between several locations, so some stuff has been added from memory and I have to add citations later when I have access to the references. Not ideal, but the best I can manage at present, sorry. Anyway I do appreciate the feedback, thanks. All the best, Dunks (talk) 05:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stagecoach-canutt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stagecoach-canutt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dunks58! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 709 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Howard Gable - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul Drane - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tim Gaze - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul Murphy (Australian journalist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Doug Ford (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bob Bertles - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bernie McGann - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:333.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:333.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 08:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Grateful-Dead_WB-7016.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Grateful-Dead_WB-7016.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 00:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:WBR_greyyellow.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WBR_greyyellow.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 00:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WBR greyyellow.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WBR greyyellow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grateful-Dead WB-7016.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grateful-Dead WB-7016.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 22:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holger Brockman

The article Holger Brockman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable recording artist, fails WP:bio. Lack of significant coverage from secondary reliable sources to assert notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 02:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Monday, June 21

Re: New Line Cinema

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to New Line Cinema. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dusty Springfield GA Review

Hi Dunks58. A GA Review of the Dusty Springfield article for which you are a significant contributor has started and is on hold to allow improvements to be made. Please go to Talk:Dusty Springfield/GA1 to see fuller comments. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 21:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Dusty Springfield article has not met GA criteria and has been failed. I really wanted to take this all the way to GA status, but it is taking too long, and I have to move on now. There are still sourcing issues to be dealt with, and coverage of Springfield's life and career needs more attention. SilkTork *^YES! 13:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pallophotophone

Dunks, thanks for adding the article on the pallophotophone. I was wondering if I could help edit by expanding on what you have. I work at GE Global Research with Russ DeMuth, the engineer that "reinvented" the pallophotophone. I would like to add some links to additional articles on the pallophotophone and add an image of Russ with the machine. Would that be okay? Thanks!

KatelynBuress (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invite

I'm new to Wikipedia editing and wanted to see if you'd be able to take a look at the edits I do after making them to get your input and see that I am doing it correctly. I highly respect the work that is done on Wikipedia and I am looking forward to contributing but I want to be sure I am doing it correctly.

Thanks!

KatelynBuress (talk) 17:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for objective participation in discussion

As a trusted editor on WP, you're invited to look at the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Cagney, Jr. and comment. Thank you. Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Loved Ones

Am just going through a major revision on The Loved Ones article, which is particularly relevant given the recent announcement about their induction into the ARIA Hall of Fame. In doing some research there are a few questions I have relating to the Milesago article on the band. In that article it states that the first single from the band was "Everlovin' Man" on the Astor Record label in early 1966, however when I've checked the details of the Astor single (such as Milesago and a 45 Discography for Astor Records) they all come up with it being released in 1975. I have also checked a number of interviews with band members and they all seem to recall that the first recording sessions resulted in their debut single being "The Loved One". Can you let me know where you came up with the information that "Everlovin' Man" was the first single as I would like to make sure the inforation on Wikipedia is as accurate as possible. Secondly in the Milesago article on the band it states that Anderson was a member of The Wild Cherries however the Milesago article on The Wild Cherries doesn't list Anderson as a member. Again the interviews with the band members seem to indicate that Terry Knott was the band's initial drummer but that he was replaced by Anderson before they made their first recordings, with Anderson 'found' by Ian Clyne. Was hoping you could help me out and clarify the band's history. Dan arndt (talk) 05:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dunks, thanks for your work here. Could you have a quick check at the infobox photo caption: did I match up the names? I was using the colour photo from Magic Box' front cover as a guide and may have mixed up the guys.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 20:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Yep, they look fine! Dunks (talk) 11:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing the clarification in relation to the band's releases - just wanted to make sure everything was as accurate as possible. Dan arndt (talk) 03:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- My pleasure Dan - glad to be of service to such a great band. Dunks (talk) 11:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gerry's birth date

Article currently has 19 July 1944, first added as 19/7/44 back on 16 March 2006. (see history). However your entry at Milesago for his obituary has 1943; but he's 15 in 1957 when the family travels to Australia so that makes it 1941 or 1942. Patrick Donovan at The Age obituary says he was 63 when he died – so born in 1942. The above entry at article history by Eric A. Warbuton seems very accurate and gives birth dates for most members but I haven't found a source for these dates.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Tweak Eric's name.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 02:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Oz magazine Issue 6 Feb 1964.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Oz magazine Issue 6 Feb 1964.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Oz magazine Issue 6 Feb 1964.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Oz magazine Issue 6 Feb 1964.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 02:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Whitaker

Hello. It's been four and a half years since you created a fascinating if idiosyncratic article on Robert Whitaker. A great amount of it is taken up by discussion of one photograph. This photograph does seem to be mostly Whitaker's doing (though I'd like to read of another party concurring that it was Whitaker's idea), but the brouhaha over it is pretty much irrelevant to Whitaker. I think that most of this material would be better hived off to a separate article: "A Somnambulant Adventure", "Yesterday and Today original cover photograph", "The Beatles butcher cover" or whatever. What do you think?

Please reply either here or at Talk:Robert Whitaker (photographer). Thanks. -- Hoary (talk) 07:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Well, we are now faced with various problems, including two major ones. First, though it's far more interesting than are any of "my" articles, this article of yours no more closely meets WP's normal requirements than do those that I was creating at the same time. Could you work a little on matching assertion to source? Secondly, what do you think would be a good title for the new article? -- Hoary (talk) 06:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WB green 1970-76.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WB green 1970-76.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warner Bros 1958 single 5007.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warner Bros 1958 single 5007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Segwick and Dylan

Hi Dunks58, thanks for your addition to "Like a Rolling Stone" article. I've edited your material and eliminated Jonathan Sedgwick's claim for reasons I've spelt out here [4]. Please comment if you disagree. Best Mick gold (talk) 10:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A request...

I´m interesting on using one of your photographs: The Brunel Shield Photo. I´m writing a book about tunelling surveying. Can i use your photo and I add to the credits/bibliography/acknowlegments? Thank you for all!

Best Regards

email: davidbodego@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidbodego (talk • contribs) 13:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Parthenon Huxley

The article Parthenon Huxley has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 22:13, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who in Australia

Thanks for you edits, I think it's added a lot to the article. MartinSFSA (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. bodnotbod (talk) 10:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not generally considered a reliable source. Consequently, your additions to The Player have been reverted. Please feel free to re-add your information with a more reliable source provided. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 13:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Herald-mural.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herald-mural.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:King-mural-07.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:King-mural-07.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Last-supper1.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Last-supper1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Mona-mural.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mona-mural.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Africamap.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Africamap.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Eagle-mural.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eagle-mural.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Eaglemural-detail.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eaglemural-detail.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Kingstautos.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kingstautos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Amnesty-mural.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amnesty-mural.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fruitshop.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fruitshop.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Wjammer1.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wjammer1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pcyc2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pcyc2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Newtown-pcyc.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Newtown-pcyc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pcyc4.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pcyc4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pcyc6.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pcyc6.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pcyc8.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pcyc8.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pcyc9.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pcyc9.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gowrie-mural.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gowrie-mural.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Greatwave2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Greatwave2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Greatwave3.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Greatwave3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Greatwave4.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Greatwave4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bella-wide.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bella-wide.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fat-albert.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fat-albert.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bella1.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bella1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bella2.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bella2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bella3.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bella3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shine1.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shine1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guarddogs.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Guarddogs.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Coulson-mural.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coulson-mural.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Emos1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emos1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Emos5.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emos5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Emos2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emos2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Emos3.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emos3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Emos7.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emos7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Emos6.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emos6.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cmrp2.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cmrp2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cmrp1.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cmrp1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cmrp3.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cmrp3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cmrp4.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cmrp4.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cmrp5.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cmrp5.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gladstone-stencils.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gladstone-stencils.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Stencil wall, Apr. 07.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stencil wall, Apr. 07.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gladst-jun.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gladst-jun.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Growyrown1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Growyrown1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Post-graf1.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Post-graf1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Oz-skel.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oz-skel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Areeee.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Areeee.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Marcia-mural.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marcia-mural.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:333poster.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:333poster.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:OctopuSS.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OctopuSS.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Maya3.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maya3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. When you recently edited Pen Tennyson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The 39 Steps and The Man Who Knew Too Much (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited HMS Black Prince (1904), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Who Do You Think You Are? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Donovan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages RAK and Arista (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article Malcolm (film). It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you. I see you've forgotten WP:SPOIL. The warning has been there for almost a month, but I've only now encountered it. For an experienced editor, that is quite surprising. Please don't do it again. Happy editing! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Beat Goes On (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Skyhooks and The Wrecking Crew

Donovan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Calypso

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. When you recently edited Phil Manzanera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Skinner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Record producer

Hi, Dunks58. I've been reading your additions to the article with interest. It is a fascinating topic, and your additions add valuable perspective and color. I'm wondering: can you source what you're adding? It all sounds perfectly verifiable, and I'll bet you've got lots of good refs, so maybe you just haven't gotten around to it yet. Rivertorch (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cilla Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lulu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Axiom (Australian band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Decca

Shel Talmy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to If Only

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Todd Rundgren, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sparks (album), David Briggs and Great Speckled Bird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Todd Rundgren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Draft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Grossman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Powell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Philippe Mora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Reed, Albert Tucker, Aspendale, St Kilda, Mike Brown, Robert Whitaker and Philip Jones

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donald Byrd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watermelon Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fred Krahe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fred Krahe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Krahe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The King of Marvin Gardens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Shining (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kommotion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mod, Shindig, Ronnie Burns, Jack Good and The Purple Hearts

Sparmac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Zoot and Daddy Cool

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beatles Arias

Good to hear that you're still at it! Graham87 10:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barry Humphries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emily Perry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asafoetida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voyageur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radio drama, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thunderbirds, Talkback and Blue Hills (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Greg Quill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Flying Circus

Terry Wilkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Flying Circus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fire (Part 1) (Homicide: Life on the Street) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tim Hunter and Julie Martin

Fire (Part 2) (Homicide: Life on the Street) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tim Hunter and Julie Martin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Atlantic Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Foreigner, Jerry Greenberg, Desolation Angels and Straight Shooter

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atlantic Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page When A Man Loves A Woman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tommy (soundtrack), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Foley and Arthur Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newtown area graffiti and street art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The African Queen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Zappa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MOFO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Frozen Flower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eon (novel) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

whom they are cooperating. Four of Vasquez's colleagues search for her in a specially-modified [[V/STOL] craft that is equipped with a "tuberider", which allows it to be hitched to the tubular

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howard Blake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Douglas Sirk may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vincent Price may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

work, and that the appearance of coral in the painting would also have attracted Price to it. <ref>[http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/painting-bought-for-just-us25/story-e6frg6n6-1111117197672.</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cam-Pact

added links pointing to The Birthday Party, Daddy Cool, Ross Wilson, Russell Smith and Mark Kennedy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Procession (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ross Wilson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of lost television broadcasts may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

stations in other states - like the popular ''[[In Melbourne Tonight]]'' with [[Graham Kennedy]])) - but the vast majority of these program tapes were later erased, or simply destroyed.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nanette Newman may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

appearance at age 11 in the 1945 short "Here We Come Gathering: A Story of the Kentish Orchards]]''. Her feature debut as a teenager was in ''[[Personal Affairs (film)|Personal Affairs]]'' in 1953.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Gillies Report may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and replacing Lacoste's familiar alligator emblem with a [[goanna]], in reference to Packer.<ref>[http://www.slq.qld.gov.au/cane-toad-times/fundraising State Library of Queensland - Cane Toad Times

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nanette Newman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadfall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Gillies Report, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double J. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Triple J, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skyhooks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Ayers Rock (band)

Hi, this message is to let you know about an RFC on the article Ayers Rock (band). A previous RfC received little participation, so we're giving it a second run and contacting individual editors who might be interested. If you have a moment, we'd greatly appreciate your participation at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Ayers Rock (band)#RfC. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 08:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jack Clayton may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Steven Spielberg]] has expressed great admiration.<ref name="McFarlane"/>, and for which star [[Dirk Bogarde was nominated for a [[BAFTA]] Best Actor award. Both films featured scores by noted

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jack Clayton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

scripted by [[Larry McMurtry]] was based on the novel by [[Jessamyn West (writer)|Jessamyn West]]), which dealt with a notorious 1824 massacre of native Americans in Indiana. Clayton, who had long
he was so enraged by Diller's decision that he put his fist through a Paramount office window.<ref>[http://articles.latimes.com/1987-12-27/entertainment/ca-31661_1_jack-clayton Roderick Mann, "

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Clayton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Clayton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Evans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armstrong Studios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skyhooks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Sounds

I'm just letting you know that since there were no sources attached to your recent 3,000+ edit on Pet Sounds, I had to tag it as WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Please source your additions if possible.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 19:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Rise and Rise of Michael Rimmer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Bates and Ronald Fraser. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Stace Birth-date and place

Hi Dunks58,
Way back in August 2009 you made comment on this Biographical article's talkpage about a picture on the page. As you were apparently interested in this Bio., I thought you may want to make a comment at Talk:Arthur Stace#Birth-date and place as there is a 'controversy' about where and when he was born. At least an IP editor is not following the reliable source, for example: here and here. I would like a few other editors to weight in with their opinions.
• There is also a current discussion (which I started) at WP:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#Arthur Stace birthplace etc where you can see more details.
Nb. If this is contrary to WP:canvassing guidelines please let me know, though on a quick look it seems allowed! If you do not wish to comment that is of course OK too! Regards 220 of ^Borg 08:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fast Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rhys Thomas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Moog synthesizer

added links pointing to Steve Howe and Tony Kaye

The Moir Sisters

added links pointing to Barry Sullivan and Phil Manning

Peter Dawkins (musician)

added a link pointing to Daddy Cool

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mesirah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yeshiva College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted Robinson (TV director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Jay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fresno

It looks like you're a fan of Fresno. Please keep in mind that peacock terms shouldn't be used to describe your favorite things. One problem that I see often on Wikipedia is that everything has a cult following, especially if it was not popular in its initial release. These sorts of things need a citation from a reliable source, such as Entertainment Weekly or Variety. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still working on it - please be patient. re: the synopsis - I'll make it as concise as possible but it's a six-hour miniseries with a very convoluted plot, so again, please bear with me. Tx Dunks (talk) 11:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Martin Denny may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

by [[DEVO]] member [[Mark Mothersbaugh]]) was an interpretation of Denny's hit exotica version of ]]Les Baxter]]'s "Quiet VIllage", and features a similar arrangement, including 'jungle' noises.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Booth at the End, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of sound recording, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hybrid and Analogue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Norm Macdonald, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DonIago (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Space (English band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC-TV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rock On (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dub. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Met

Hi Dunks; we need to stop this reverting (from both sides) and work out out a paragraph on talk. Nobody is questioning the substance of your edits, more their length and framing; this is a very broad issue, hardly specific to the Met. So it doesn't seem like I'm canvassing, take this as an olive branch (with mixed feelings I'm inclined towards your POV), and will be asking others to comment and work through an agreed wording *on the talk*. Ceoil (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Looted art

added links pointing to Khmer and Romanesque

Something Wicked This Way Comes (film)

added links pointing to CGI and Arthur Hill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of multitrack recording, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wrecking Crew. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Shirley Thompson vs. the Aliens

added links pointing to Matt Carroll and Brian Thomson

Harvest Records

added a link pointing to Roger Dean

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lysergic acid diethylamide, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peter Blake and Michael English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Split Enz

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Split Enz, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.milesago.com/Artists/enz.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Split Enz and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Split Enz, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Split Enz. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Split Enz with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Split Enz saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

I've also posted on the article talk page. It's probably best that you reply there.gadfium 00:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RevDel_advice. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Stewie Speer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Stewie Speer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.milesago.com/Obits/speers.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Stewie Speer and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Stewie Speer, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Stewie Speer. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Stewie Speer with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Stewie Speer saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Mordant Ian Bannerman

Hi Dunks58,

This edit;

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deadly_Earnest&diff=prev&oldid=711184316

Did you mean anything other than dry or biting in his mordant wit? MartinSFSA (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please get back to me, when you see this Dunks58 MartinSFSA (talk) 14:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dunks58, badly want to discuss this with you. "Mordant" is a common misspelling ... of Bannerman's dad's name! Did you know that or was it coincidence? MartinSFSA (talk) 00:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still want to discuss this! 12:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Still here, Dunks58. MartinSFSA (talk) 00:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still eager to discuss it, Dunks58. MartinSFSA (talk) 01:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dunks58. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dunks58. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Dunks58. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Itchycoo Park

Hello Dunks58. If you can recall, what reference did you use for an edit (electro-mechanical studio process...) on Itchycoo Park you made on October 27, 2011? Thanks, Normakku (talk) 01:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Deaths-Head Revisited

added links pointing to The Little Mermaid (film), Ben Wright, 101 Dalmatians, The Diary of Anne Frank (film) and The Untouchables

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

There are several mistakes on The Real Ellen McIlwaine. No references. Incorrectly formatted headers. The second word in a header is not to be capitalized unless it's a proper noun. Also, you need to make bulleted and numbered lists for the personnel section and track listing, respectively. Please see WP:MOSALBUM. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 22:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dunks58. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tommy Brown (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bobby Graham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrecking Crew

I like the things you added to the Wrecking Crew article a lot. I was wondering if you could provide the source from where the info came. That would allow us to add citations for the material. Thanks. Garagepunk66 (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Split (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Spy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jesus Christ Superstar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 16:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesus Christ Superstar (Original Australian Cast Recording), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robin Ramsay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bryan MacLean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calexico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delta (Australian TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gregg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vogue (Madonna song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Closeapple (talk) 17:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Closeapple#Re: Peoria. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Also, using false edit summaries like "fixed typo" for actual content changes will only draw more attention to whether your edits are in good faith. Closeapple (talk) 17:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Vogue (Madonna song), you may be blocked from editing. You did not fix any typo, you blatantly added content not supported by any source, including your own original bullshit. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What you're adding to Vogue isn't based on reliable sources, and that which is sourced is minor or irrelevant. For instance, that stuff about the remix, I assume the Billboard link verifies some chart position, but it certainly doesn't verify "ironcially" [sic] or the rest of the paragraph. Drmies (talk) 05:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vogue (Madonna song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salsa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 19:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judy Geeson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Rivals of Sherlock Holmes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Gordon (promoter)

Your edits to that article seem to be speculative, perhaps based on your own research. And, obviously, your claims that you are merely correcting typos are false. Given past discussions on this page, I'll revert your edits. If you can provide reliable sources they can be reinstated later. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dunks58. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dunks58. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Hulmem. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Cowsills, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 19:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Carl Reiner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will add citations asap. Don't be so inpatient. There are very few significant references to this production, Dunks (talk) 10:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No reason you couldn't have waited to add the info until you had references either... DonIago (talk) 14:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited It Hurts to Be in Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wrecking Crew. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Echo & the Bunnymen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Order.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cloisters Cross

The text you wrote in 2016 lacks info on who sat until midnight drinking coffee to buy the artifact from Topic Mimara. Friendly Neighbour (talk) 17:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bellbird (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robin Ramsay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Everybody's (Australian magazine)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Everybody's (Australian magazine) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.milesago.com/Press/everybodys.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sennecaster (talk) 21:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bottoms Up (1960 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Good Life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Stoecker

Hi Dunks58, I see you added the cover of Roxy Music's debut album to this article as an example of the artist's work – the problem is I'm not sure it meets WP:NFCCP because it does not illustrate the subject of the article, which is Karl Stoecker... I will check with others regarding the image use policy. More serious is the fact that this article contains no sources whatsoever – without sources it's likely to be nominated for deletion and then the issue of the image becomes irrelevant anyway. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karl Stoecker

The article Karl Stoecker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paul Whiteman, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:27, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Turner (pianist)

Please remember to cite sources for all content you add to the encyclopedia. If you prefer to create an article first and add references later, please do so as a draft and not in mainspace. Thanks. PamD 05:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving your talk page

You really should think about archiving most of the past postings/threads on your Talk page – it's become too long to navigate... Just a suggestion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zelda Fitzgerald under FA review

I have nominated Zelda Fitzgerald for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. As you edited this article in the past, your input there and further contributions to the article would be appreciated. — Flask (talk) 02:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timescape (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timescape (film), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timescape (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fred Krahe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fred Krahe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Krahe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Heyallkatehere (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Eric Abetz. Thank you. St Anselm (talk) 00:21, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Roger Davies (fictional character)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Roger Davies (fictional character) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 17#Roger Davies (fictional character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Real Ellen McIlwaine

The article The Real Ellen McIlwaine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced for years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 255.5 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Real Ellen McIlwaine (LP).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Real Ellen McIlwaine (LP).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julie Felix, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hydra and George Johnston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Your edit to Ettore Stratta has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. /wiae /tlk 23:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Rafelson

The article Peter Rafelson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fram (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hi Dunks58. I wanted to let you know that I've removed the autopatrolled user right from your account due to some concerns about the articles you've created: as you've been told elsewhere on this talk page, a number have been unsourced BLPs (e.g. Russell Guy, Karl Stoecker, Peter Rafelson), and others have had copyright issues (e.g. Ettore Stratta). You're still welcome to create new articles, but they'll just go through the usual new page patrol process to make sure they meet our policies on copyright, sourcing, etc. Let me know if you have any questions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lee Gordon (promoter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fabian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ettore Stratta

Hello, Dunks58,

Thank you for creating Ettore Stratta.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, could you please include the sources from which this information comes from? There are articles in the NYT and Jazz Times that I found.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benn F. Reyes

The article Benn F. Reyes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No online sources found, questionable notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]