Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jargon Database

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:48, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Jargon Database

Alexa rank well into 7 figures, "what links here" shows only one entry, Creative Plumbing, already on VfD as spam. Strongly suspect this page is also vanity spam. Chris 00:12, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

delete only 1200 entries isn't enough for notability. DDerby 01:42, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Weak keep: I'll admit it doesn't seem to be too notable at the moment but I do feel that it is something worth keeping and encyclopaedic. --Fuzzball! (talk) 04:05, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable, advertising. Rick K 05:05, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Delete: advert. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:56, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, replace with redirect to Jargon file. Radiant _* 10:02, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

It is located at http://www.jargondatabase.com and first appeared in December 2004. It is a for-profit endeavor, and seeks to generate revenue via advertising, although revenue has been fairly low as of 2005.

Delete Advertising. Mgm|^(talk) 10:09, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

Delete not notable. Support a redirect to Jargon file as suggested above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:23, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Delete as advertising, subject not sufficiently notable. But I don't think this name should redirect to Jargon file; although that might be a better (and non-commercial and unencumbered) resource for what a user might probably be looking for, the two aren't equivalent. Plus there's a (miniscule) chance that jargondatabase-dot-com will eventually become sufficiently noteworthy in the future, just as we once would have deleted Google but wouldn't now. Barno 18:42, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep - Essentially Different to Jargon file. Treat this as weak. --Irishpunktom\^talk 13:32, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable, promo. -- 8^D ^gab 15:48, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)

Redirect, no merge, to Jargon file - this would be a reasonable name for that entry. Per Barno's suggestion, redirects can always be replaced later if by some weird chance this becomes a notable topic. CDC (talk) 15:59, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to Jargon File. See above. --Carnildo 23:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.