Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unified Knowledge Management
Manager/marketroid jargon. Pyrop 03:27, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Can we say "jargon"? Delete. --Slowking Man 05:52, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Transfer this information object synergetically to the circular under-desk document repository. Ianb 07:56, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - Tεxτurε 19:23, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. (If not keep, then merge or redirect to Knowledge management). Its a real thing. It could definately use a little translation to english (from consultant-speak) though. Needs Cleanup! Kim Bruning 10:24, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep if the article becomes less general and theoretical, therefore useless, it needs precise explanations and exemples. --Pgreenfinch 13:12, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- ie. you're saying that potentially the article will be good? In that case, I think you can just vote keep. :-) Kim Bruning 15:05, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- By coincidence, I am currently consulting on an integrated IT solution combining Content management, Document management, Collaboration management and intelligent Search engines. We're not calling it "Unified Knowledge Management". None of the articles I'm reading use that specific term. It's either "Knowledge Management" or "Content Management" (or more often "Electronic Content Management" because TLAs sell better). Excluding the wikipedia clones and the non-specific uses of the phrase (i.e. "wouldn't it be nice if we had a unified KM system..."), I find very few uses of that specific phrase and none outside of the marketing pages of consulting websites. Either delete as a neologism or redirect to content management system until the market settles on a standard term. Rossami 03:32, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect, according to User:Rossami's reasoning. Neologism. Andris 20:50, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: neologism with no currency. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:02, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)