Jump to content

Talk:Brookfield Place (New York City)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Comments

[edit]

How much of this was damaged or destroyed on September 11, 2001? This should be discussed in the article. --Daniel C. Boyer 19:19, 24 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

According to the brochure, during reconstrution after 9/11, more than 500 laborer's worked to replace 60,000 square feet of tricolor Italian marble, 2,000 glass panes, and sixteen 43-foot-tall Washingtonia palm trees in the 10-story Winter Garden in a record nine months.

The Ann Taylor link does not point to Ann Taylor clothing stores but that's the actual tenant. I resisted the urge to add a Godiva link (there's a Godiva Chocolatier tenant.)

There was a several-hour television series on the construction of one of the WFC towers, from design to completion, focusting on conflicts among the parties. It's been years since I saw this. Does this ring a bell for anyone?

Page should be renamed to New York World Financial Center to keep it seperate from Shanghai World Financial Center

Lehman Brothers are still listed as tenants. Should they be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.162.181.34 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Third paragraph, sentence 1: "In the September 11 attacks One World Financial Center had a massive piece of steel shot into its west side and other debris severely damaged the lobby and lower floors making One World Financial Center was severely damaged and in danger of collapse.' needs to be reworded. Nutinurmacaroni (talk) 11:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

[edit]

World Financial seems more correct and marketing free.Kim for sure (talk) 01:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the title of this article should revert back to World Financial Center according to Wikipedia's common name policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.230.38.120 (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 July 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved as the requester has withdrawn. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Music1201 talk 20:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


– per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC – If you look at [1], you will see that in the last 60 days that Brookfield Place in New York City has the most page views. Doing a quick Google Search reveals the top two pages showing results for the complex in New York City, therefore, the one in New York is primary topic. ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀 19:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Here is a statistics link comparing all places on the disambiguation page: 230 views/day for New York vs. 219 for the other three (108 for Toronto, 85 for Calgary, and 26 for Perth). The disambiguation page itself gets 14/day. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Given a difference between 230 views/day vs. 219 for the other three,[2] that does not seem to pass the criterion on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC that reads, "more likely than all the other topics combined". The difference of only 11 per day could easily be explained as either recent news spikes (since it is located across the street from the World Trade Center site) or the fact that New York City has a greater population (which, in the latter, would lead to more NYC residents searching for that information within their own city, but not necessary searches from an international readership). Thus I would be hesitant to make the NYC location the primary topic at this time. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw you do all have a good point. ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀 00:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brookfield Place (New York City). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brookfield Place (New York City). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brookfield_Place_(New_York_City)&oldid=1200383126"