Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Snoid
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 22:29, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Not noteworthy - returned no Google hits Brookie 13:41, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- You're obviously better than me! - but does 1 count as noteworthy? 14:16, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I don't know; maybe put a kiwi stub and a cleanup req on it, see what happens/ Nateji77 14:37, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- You're obviously better than me! - but does 1 count as noteworthy? 14:16, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Has four valid outgoing wikilinks to bands. (Alternatively review the whole of Special:Contributions/Ross-c with a view to VfD. A piecemeal nomination of one article is pointless.) -- RWH 17:42, 2005 Feb 12 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable - 25 Google hits. Megan1967 02:21, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, barely. Wyss 12:02, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- keep - member of four of New Zealand's top bands of the 1980s, and writer of at least one chart-topping song. The small number of Google hits may be largely because he was known as Andrew McLennan for much of his career. Grutness|hello? 06:39, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.