Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Warsaw Uprising/archive1
Appearance
This article was totally restructered as a series (rather than one long article), so I am clearing out the old objections and renewing it. Here is Mozzerati's summary: I have now done much more to fix the TOC; a complete restructuring into a series. I think people should now review it again as a fresh article and make comments (N.B. I may have introduced mistakes whilst summarising). Overall, I think it looks good since there was quite alot of good material. There could still be some expansion of the other pages in the series, but looking at other series which have their main article featured these are already quite complete. →Raul654 20:01, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. I was just going to nominate this, actually. --Tothebarricades.tk 04:33, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Support. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 17:51, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
The sections Aftermath and The Legacy are unevenly linked with their subarticles. Would be nice if the ==-headings corresponded directly to subarticles (in this case).[[User:Sverdrup|❝Sverdrup❞]] 22:53, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)- this first part is now corrected (whether or not it was an objection :-); capitulation now clearly separated fron legacy
Object - needs a ==Reference== section. See Wikipedia:Cite your sources. Article much better though.---mav 06:26, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)- This section is now added. Any more objections? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 10:05, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Great! Support. --mav 06:11, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- This section is now added. Any more objections? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 10:05, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Halibutt 05:43, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC)