Talk:Battle of Aachen
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Aachen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Battle of Aachen has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opening Comments
[edit]The date is off, most likely by a year - January 2 1944 is before the invasion of Normandy.
The first sentence of the second paragraph appears to be misplaced/doesn't flow with the rest of the paragraph. It's not clear what the "however" in the 2nd sentence is contradicting in the first sentence, and from it one assumes that the first sentence is supposed to be something like "The allies didn't think Aachen was important and thus didn't want to invade it." Epugachev 06:00, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps the article could be included in the Aachen article and this story could be about the Medal of Honor winner. Tswold (talk) 14:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The battle is seperate from Aachen, and is a notable one in regards to the campaign and the unit history. The seperate article is just fine IMO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.73.120.68 (talk) 07:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
The reference to Operation Market Garden is factualy untrue, the operation was not linked to opening up Antwerp - in fact Montgomery was critercised for not doing this and trying to break through to the Rhur. See Montgomery page for more details on this. Kiern Moran —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.7.195 (talk) 10:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Gerhard Wilck a General or Colonel?
[edit]This article lists Wilck as a general; the Wikipedia article on Wilck lists him as a colonel. Perhaps he was a colonel at the time and promoted to general later? Catherinejarvis (talk) 00:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Many years later I respond that several sources show him as a colonel. If he was a general, he was promoted during the few weeks before the surrender to encourage him, like General Paulus, not to surrender and never got the commission, or at least no source I have seen bothers to mention that, or (almost impossibly) he was promoted while sitting out the last seven months of the war in a prison camp, or (most unlikely but perhaps not impossible) was in the West German Army in later years and was made a general. A fourth possibility, I suppose, is that there might have been a General Wilck who was a different person. Donner60 (talk) 11:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- The German Wiki gives him as "Oberst" (colonel), if he was promoted to general this would be most likely mentioned. And there was no other "Wilck" in any notable position in the Wehrmacht. ciao --Pentaclebreaker (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Aachen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070515123018/http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/Spiller/Spiller.asp to http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/Spiller/Spiller.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Background
[edit]"[...] fortifications protecting Aachen and the Ruhr were a formidable obstacle [...] " may it be that the river Rur is meant? As the aim was the Ruhr area and the fortifications of the Siegfried line were spanning along the River Rur?
Ciao --Pentaclebreaker (talk) 13:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- A-Class Germany articles
- High-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- A-Class military history articles
- A-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- A-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- A-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review
- A-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- A-Class United States articles of High-importance
- WikiProject United States articles