User talk:DS1953/Archive03

This is an archive, please do not edit this page. Feel free to leave a message here.

George Sanford

Why is George Sanford's name on there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.214.13.38 (talk • contribs)

I have now removed it, too. Thank you. -- DS1953 ^talk 04:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-Semitic people

Vote They are attempting to close the +cat AGAIN, please vote to KEEP. SirIsaacBrock 10:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DS1953! Thank you for your support of my request for adminship. I look forward to seeing you more around the project. Thanks again, and if you ever see something that I could be doing better, feel free to leave me a message. E WS23 | (Leave me a message!) 01:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hammond??

Sorry DS1953, I thought you were referring the below to an edit I made on another page. My bad.

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hammond. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- DS1953 talk 15:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments in Lar's RfA!

We are here to build an encyclopedia!	Hi, and thank you for your supportive comments in my request for adminship! With a final tally of (109/5/1), I have been entrusted with adminship. It's been several weeks since the conclusion of the process, so hopefully you've had a chance to see me in action. Please let me know what you think! Thanks again! ++Lar: t/c 03:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
	Adverts: Like The Beatles?... Like LEGO?... In a WikiProject that classifies?... Are you an accountable admin?... Got DYK?...

My RfA

DS1953/Archive03, thank you for participating in my RfA. Unfortunately, a great number of oppose voters felt that I lacked experience, and a consensus was not reached (the final tally was 30/28/10). Perhaps I will try again in another few months when I have a few more edits under my belt. If I do, I hope I can count on your support. Thanks again! Cool3 talk 20:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

thanks for watching the Bonnie and Clyde article

DS1953 Thanks much for your watching - and reverting the fairly constant vandalism - to the Bonnie and Clyde article. A lot of people worked very hard to finally get an article everyone was comfortable with, and for whatever reasons, we have unusally bad vandalism problems. Your efforts are GREATLY appreciated.old windy bear 00:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]