Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mopeygoth

Mopeygoth was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Delete Perjorative neologism. Grice 23:22, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Somewhere in the sticky realm between dicdef and neologism. --Improv 06:40, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete Krupo 07:39, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
Tentative delete. It may be that this is actually a well-known term in the goth community, although I've never heard of it before. Lacrimosus 10:25, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Neologism and obvious. Geogre 12:46, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Weak keep and cleanup. It is a fairly well known term; in goth phylogenetics it represents the opposite of perkygoth. Smerdis of Tlön 16:26, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Uh....NO. (LOL). Oh, and Delete. Terrapin 17:43, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I would have voted to delete perkygoth except for the fact that sources were cited (I rewrote it as a comic book archetype though) Grice 00:12, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- /me thwaps IHCOYC with a.g.s-f Cluebat - David Gerard 23:55, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Not pejorative, but not in common use outside the internet. Mainly on alt.gothic. If anyone can fine ONE PRINTED REFERENCE for it and rewrite based on it, I'll say 'keep'. Else redirect to goth - don't delete, a redirect will discourage its recreation - David Gerard 23:55, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.