Jump to content

Talk:Film (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note entirely sure

[edit]

I'm still not entirely sure about this:

A possible reading of this is that self-perception is inescapable. Thus, it is not surprising that the original script begins with George Berkeley's dictum, "esse est percipi," meaning, "to be is to be perceived."

It seems to me that the point of the film is that avoidance of all perception is impossible, because one cannot avoid self-perception, which is slightly different to what the article says. And because avoidance of perception is impossible, one cannot cease to be. This perhaps makes sense of the scene (not described in the article) where he tears up some old photos of himself, and would seem to make more sense of the Berkeley quote (to me, anyway). There's perhaps some Cartesian influence in all that. But anyway, I'm not going to change anything about interpretation until I've got to some sources that tell me what critics have made of it all - then I can attribute these interpreatations to people instead of waffling on myself. --Camembert

An anon editor has changed the reference to a print of God on the wall to a print of a Phoenician statue. Now, I've not seen the film itself in ages, but the script as published says it is a print of "God the Father"; was this changed when it was shot? If so, I think it's an important enough change that it's worth us noting it in the article. Can anybody confirm what is actually in the film? --Camembert 18:51, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like it is Sumerian. I've added details and souces. See an image of it here. --FaWaka (talk) 03:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1979 remake Not monochrome

[edit]

I removed 'in monochrome and' from the intro.
"Colour is in fact used by Clark with great restraint." Richard Cave’s review of the 1979 version of the film
Great explanation - I was really confused by Film itself ! --195.137.93.171 (talk) 22:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Film cover.jpg

[edit]

Image:Film cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Film (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing title

[edit]

This page has a confusing title. Can someone change it? Buster Reynolds (talk) 12:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

History of the film

[edit]

I added the "essay" tag because this is written very much like an essay. Lines like "If Beckett were Shakespeare he might well have written: “To be seen or not to be seen, that is the question."", rhetorical questions such as "But what happens when you are alone?", and phrases such "it comes as no surprise that..." seem especially out of place in an encyclopedia. This is a very interesting analysis of a film I personally love, but not exactly suited to here. Also, this lacks much information about the history of the film, its production and release and all that. This is a rather good essay, but a rather poor Wikipedia page. StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Film_(film)&oldid=1204687779"