User talk:Curps/archive9
Apollomelos2
[edit]Just to let you know Apollomelos2 IS Noah Peters. It is a sock puppet he created to attack and impersonate ME. He agreed to arbritrator Raul for a permanent block to avoid an arbcom ruling against him brought forth on my part. He has returned in violation and attacked all the users that had blocked him in the past including gay-related articles. See vandalism in progress page for further details. Apollomelos 03:28, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Misc
[edit]Hi. Just wanted to let you know that when I blocked you I did not know that you were an admin nor that you voted already on the Gdansk issue. Otherwise I would have waited for one more comment before blocking you. I also did not receive an email from you asking to be unblocked. If you ever see me doing a 3RR, feel free to put it on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. As for the 3RR rule: It's not perfect, but I think it will be rather difficult to formulate something else. if you can come up with a proposal, that would be good. Also, i greatly appreciate it that you did not unblock yourself. I just hope that you;re not upset with me personally.
On another point, some of the inline discussion on Talk:Gdansk/Vote is getting lengthy, and I am considering to move it to a new Comment section at the end of the Cross-Naming Gdansk/Danzig vote. You can also start such a section yourself if you wish. Best regards, -- Chris 73 Talk 12:04, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
User:JillandJack has been blocked; it appears they were merely the latest reincarnation of a previously-banned user, User:DW (a/k/a User:Joe Canuck, User:Angelique, etc.) Bearcat 00:23, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
THANK you sir for asking my assistance and for your last information. I had only the time to quickly review this User's modifications; some of them were indeed POV... I will soon get involved in the debate on the Talk page. Is the JillandJack incarnation banned at this moment or not? Thanks again. --Liberlogos 04:55, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The "Election" message
[edit]Hi. Thanks for taking off that rather strange VfD election that turned on up my discussion page. What happened? Was this anon going around all over the place adding this to people's discussion pages? Weird. 23skidoo 03:50, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I, on the other hand, would appreciate if you did not remove entries from my talk page (except possibly in the case of clear vandalism). --L33tminion | (talk) 06:30, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Well, the point is, this anon user called his own edits to talk pages "vandalism" when he reported himself to Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress (!). See [1]. I reverted on that basis. -- Curps 06:34, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Ah... that's unusual. --L33tminion | (talk) 06:44, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
GSherman
[edit]No, you should be aware of the three revert rule. You are poised to break it before I am. Lesson: stop the cover up. GSherman 08:59, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
No, you should read the NPOV policy. I am merely reporting what some human rights activists and scholars have written on a number of important U.S. figures; you are violating the NPOV policy by attempting to cover up their allegations (notice that the article deals with alleged war criminals). GSherman 09:04, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
No, you are attempting to insert your POV opinions (morally equivalent to those of a Holocaust denier), transparent disclaimers to the contrary notwithstanding. GSherman 09:15, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Your violation of the 3RR
[edit]You repeated violations of the 3RR have been reported on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. GSherman 09:22, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- The 3RR rule applies to more than three reverts, not exactly three. -- Curps 09:26, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Quit going through my user history; that's trolling behavior. [personal attack removed - RadicalSubversiv E] GSherman 11:31, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
GSherman
[edit]I've just warned this user against making personal attacks, but I don't have the energy to get any further involved at the moment. Let me know if you need certification for an RFC in the future (assuming an admin doesn't take the initiative to ban this character outright). Note that s/he has just used up 3 reverts at Bill Clinton. RadicalSubversiv E 11:54, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
PLEASE VOTE
[edit]- Wikipedia talk:Requested moves - help save Requested Moves, bring friends. I'd hope you vote to keep voting at RM instead of running away to cabal at distant talk pages. —ExplorerCDT 18:57, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Gdańsk/Danzig inine discussion
[edit]I moved part of inline discussion from Forseti header to my userpage discussion as I think it belong there more. Also look for the answer there. BTW: do you use IRC? If so, when is it possible to catch you there? Forseti 21:21, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Question
[edit]I got an e-mail today from Oirvine, stating that their banning was in error and they aren't JillandJack. Now, I'm fully aware that this isn't at all inconsistent with the whole saga, and even the existing evidence is already pretty overwhelming. But I'd like to ask anyway: how do I find out and/or who do I ask to review Oirvine's IP to see if it's consistent with any of the other identities or not? Bearcat 23:47, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]What's a bot?
Thank you!
[edit]Thanks for finishing the Anuzutica VfD. 'Twas driving me batty. I owe you a beverage! -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:09, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)