Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purocracy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:48, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable band. Four google hits Sjakkalle 12:28, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Advertising, and the band is unsigned. Geogre 15:16, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails notability test, band vanity. Megan1967 01:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a bit strong, asking for User:Dvanity to be banned ;-) (Oh, and delete for failing WP:MUSIC while we're at it). Chris talk back 02:36, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability (or lack thereof). -- Krash 19:36, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete, the band, although unsigned, is mentioned on the Music of Portugal page and therefore reserves the right to an article
- Can you read up on WP:MUSIC and point to which one of the criteria for notability Purocracy fulfills? Sorry, but if it doesn't fulfill any of those, Purocracy deserves a mention on the Music of Portugal page and not much else. Sjakkalle 06:15, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.