Jump to content

Talk:Cross of Valour (Canada)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCross of Valour (Canada) was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 15, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 10, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Cross of Valour and the Star of Courage (pictured) are the two highest ranks of Canadian Bravery Decorations?

Untitled

[edit]

I have added a list from http://www.gg.ca/Search/honours_e.asp but its not in chronological order. Feel free to change this list to make it more efficient User:Dowew May 14 2005

Perhaps this should be turned into a disambig page ?

Better Picture

[edit]

I Think this is a better picture of the CV

Canadian Cross of Valour Dowew 01:14, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Amédéo Garrammone

[edit]

The list gives "Sergent Amédéo Garrammone 1980". However, the article it links to refers to him as Private (not Sergeant) Amédéo Garrammone. Which is correct?

He was undoubtably a private when he recieved the award and was later made seargent.Colin 8 22:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged

[edit]

it appears the link that produced the list of recipents is no longer valid, hence, this list is not verifiable anymore. I've tagged the list. I've also replaced the link with a working link about the Cross of Valour.--Isotope23 12:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Military Award

[edit]

I feel I should note that this award, while available to members of the military for acts committed while on duty or in the good of the service, is not a military award. It is a civilian award, available to any person who commits a high act of bravery in Canada, involving Canadians, or otherwise involving Canada. I will now appropriately amend the article to affirm this.JMesh (talk) 03:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cross of Valour (Canada)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 06:26, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  • As its Cross of Valour should it not be Croix de la Vaillance with a capital V
  • the highest honour available for Canadian civilians - as its awarded to non Canadians this should be reworded - the highest honour awarded by Canada to civilians or similar
  • a miniature cross may be worn on the ribbon bar in undress - I know what you mean but oit sounds as if they are naked
  • In the Eligibility section Anyone may nominate or be nominated for receipt of the Cross of Valour a short line on how you nominate someone would be useful, but not including it will not fail GA
  • Can the recipients be changed into prose. A the moment its a short list, but in ten years and another 50/100 awards it would unmanageable. You could include how many were posthumous, and why they were awarded/circumstances and link to the [Category:Recipients of the Cross of Valour (Canada)] which makes the list redundant.
  • No disambig links need fixing
  • All external links checked and in order
  • A good job just some minor points. If you disagree with anything, just let me know.

On hold

[edit]

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.Jim Sweeney (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you need more time ? Jim Sweeney (talk) 15:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Failed GA no progress Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cross of Valour (Canada). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cross of Valour (Canada). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cross_of_Valour_(Canada)&oldid=1214056509"