Talk:Cooperative Linux

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not a stub

Could we remove the 'This article is a stub' ?

Thanks Xinit. I used simultaneously as a rewrite so as not to infringe on copyrights. Jondel 01:20, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)~~

Capitalization on Japanese Names

Just FYI. There is a custom in for the Chinese and Japanese to write their last names in all caps ins English so as to distinguish more clearly which is the last name; as it is not too distinguishible in the Western world.

This may be a Chinese/Japanese custom, but I don't believe it's a Wikipedia one. If you have examples of this use within Wikipedia, please show me. Remember that links in Wikipedia are case sensitive after the first letter, so we would need to have the display name different from the link name. If you feel strongly, by all means change it back, I'm not going to press the point further. --Gadfium 03:35, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Grammar nitpicking

Under the "Comparisons" heading, the following sentence leaves me wondering whether "solutions" are distinct from "methods," and how else Xen might be considered "other": "Cooperative Linux is significantly different from traditional virtualization solutions such as VMware, plex86, Virtual PC, and other methods such as Xen, which generally work by running the guest OS in a less privileged mode than that of the host kernel." Is Xen not traditional? Not virtualizing? --D021317c 17:49, 5 May 2006 (EDT)

Nomachine and FreeNX

Given that cooperative linux does not yet support a Linux X server I have found that the easiest thig to do is to run FreeNX server under co-operative Linux and the Nomachine client (actually an X server) under Windows. You then create a Microsoft loopback interface ( a dummy LAN port ) for the X apllications on colinux to talk to the Nomachine client on Windows over the loopback port. dieselnutjob

BSD

Is anyone working on a BSD kernel that can run as a Windows application just like coLinux? dieselnutjob

Dan Aloni

The article on Dan Aloni has been proposed to be deleted. Since authors of this article probably know more about him that most, perhaps you can contribute on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Aloni. —mako ๛ 03:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Package management

Does coLinux manages packages in the Debian way (*.deb, apt-get...) or in the Red Hat way (*.rpm ..). Can one download or install coLinux with Debian inside ?.--Mac (talk) 18:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

coLinux is really a Virtual Machine, similar to VMWare or Xen -- it is not an operating system. A package manager is part of the operating system. There are several coLinux projects which run Ubuntu, such as andLinux [1] & Ulteo Virtual Desktop [2]. I believe that there are some other projects using Fedora, Slackware, etc. Within 'andLinux', I can use all of the regular Ubuntu tools, such as 'apt-get install traceroute'. -=Gigglesworth (talk) 22:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus images should be removed

Since certain images have had their Windows background removed, they no longer show what they purport to show. I think they should be removed. Yworo (talk) 18:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If they are bogus, why not upload non-bogus images? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.240.106.202 (talk) 18:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free, as long as the proper license is used. If the images are non-free, make sure they are low-res. Yworo (talk) 18:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me? No no, sorry, but I don't bother to contribute to a place that lets anyone vandalize content... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.240.106.202 (talk) 19:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. Yworo (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the "screenshots" are confusing. I run Linux only so don't have the ability to take screenshots of CoLinux in action. But I think it would help the reader of the article if they could see what it actually looks likes to use and run it. Cinemageddon (talk) 06:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

contradiction

The sections "Overview" states first, that both systems are twins. Then it tells you, that this is actually impossible and hence one is the father of the other. I'd call this a contradiction. --Boobarkee (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

strange hardware?

This article talks about strange hardware or an unusual hardware structure that makes colinux installs difficult to make. However it does not mention why it is unusual or how. If the article is updated I think that part warrants a bit more attention.

Based on the description of how people create images I suspect it is unusual primarily in that:

1. Non-standard boot sequence: It doesn't need an MBR/partition table for the main FS and already provides a kernel/filesystem. Normal installation media wont boot. 2. It appears to be a completely headless kernel (other then a possible serial console, network). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:978:2300:30A:A0FB:EC68:6D86:DE62 (talk) 21:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cooperative Linux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080203041828/http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-virtualization-colinux/ to http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-virtualization-colinux/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]