Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granduncle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:53, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedia definition of a neologism. Delete. Feco 20:29, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Not a neologism. Dicdef of existing word. I was wondering about this, though. I would say transwiki except that Wiktionary already has a perfectly good definition. Do dictionary definitions have to serve their time here on VfD if Wiktionary already has them? In any case this article should go away so I say delete. FreplySpang 20:38, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Yes they do. Being a dictionary article is not a speedy deletion criterion. Uncle G 03:55, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
- Delete, duplicate dictionary definition. Megan1967 02:44, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- There's not even as much to say here as there is at uncle. And family already links to the dictionary articles. Delete. Uncle G 03:55, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.