Talk:Arunachal Pradesh

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arunachal Pradesh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: Arunachal Pradesh / States / Geography / History Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Arunachal Pradesh (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian states (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Tibet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Asia Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Unsourced map

I have removed this supposed Chinese map from the main page because I couldn't find its source. If anybody knows, please discuss it here. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gaon bura

One of the image captions says:"A Adi Gaonbura commonly found both in Arunachal Pradesh and China". It should be changed to say: "An Adi gaon bura (village head) commonly found both in Arunachal Pradesh and China". It is unclear whether "commonly found" is about the role (village head) or the tribe (Adi). 2001:1BA8:1482:1200:353B:51BC:CAE8:9450 (talk) 11:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and used the image description. The previous description in the image was to set a certain narrative by sock puppet. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 April 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

NortheastStories (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss the Taniland Insurgency, under the insurgency section. I feel that it is important for the context of Arunachal.

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the Emblem be and state symbols be removed?

Gilgit Baltistan, Azad Kashmir, and Ladakh dont have state symbols or their emblem featured due to the territory being disputed and to make it less contriversial. With that logic, because a war happened between China and India in Arunachal pradesh, and is still disputed, the emblem and state symbol should be removed. Eehuiio (talk) 23:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis of Taiwanese government websites

@157.15.55.219: Concerning your addition:

However, Taiwan has now excluded it from the scope of mainland China and treat it as part of India.^[1]^[2]

Please read the Wikipedia policy on original research and synthesis. There are a few issues with this proposed content addition:

Both references are to primary sources, which the Wikipedia policy on original research and synthesis says should not be analyzed, interpreted, or synthesized by editors. Secondary reliable sources are necessary for a statement about Arunachal Pradesh in relation to the laws and claims of the Republic of China, the Taiwan Area, mainland China, etc.
The first reference does not mention Arunachal Pradesh, South Tibet, or India.
The second reference does not mention Arunachal Pradesh or South Tibet. It's also a basic country info page and shouldn't be considered an authoritative reliable source on borders, territorial claims, nor anything else of a controversial nature.
By Wikipedia policy on verifiability, such a statement must be accompanied by an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material where A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if the information is present explicitly in the source.

— MarkH₂₁^talk 20:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Laws and Regulations Regarding Mainland Affairs". Mainland Affairs Council. Retrieved 30 May 2018. Article 3: The enforcement areas of Subparagraph 2 of Article 2 of the Act shall refer to areas under control of the Chinese Communists.
^ "印度共和國 Republic of India". Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). 中華民國外交部.

[1] "Laws and Regulations Regarding Mainland Affairs". Mainland Affairs Council. Retrieved 30 May 2018. Article 3: The enforcement areas of Subparagraph 2 of Article 2 of the Act shall refer to areas under control of the Chinese Communists.

[2] "印度共和國 Republic of India". Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). 中華民國外交部.

[1]

[2]