Talk:Kaizen
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaizen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
how many approaches?
[edit]The last sentence of the lead paragraph of § Overview is
- Two kaizen approaches have been distinguished.
Really? I count five: Point, System, Line, Plane, and Cube.
--Thnidu (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Line isn't actually defined here, though. Arided (talk) 11:10, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Related topics
[edit]Removed self-promoting, non-neutral prior content, truncating to just a list of related topics. LoneStarNot (talk) 00:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles